The Institute of One World Leadership (IOWL), through its Global Institute for Calibre and Integrity, is making its Calibre development architecture and routes to Calibre Credits™ available more widely to universities and employers, arguing that efforts to raise productivity must address not only what people know and can do, but the Calibre with which they exercise that Capability and Competency.
Read the 29 September release >Universities & Employers >Productivity briefing >The current productivity initiative is the latest manifestation of a much longer development journey. IOWL has spent more than a decade building an integrated architecture around Calibre; over the past year that work has increasingly entered external policy, education, integrity and productivity conversations.
The work develops from the Capacity Conundrum™ and Axiological Pyramid™ through Positive Value Leadership™, 24 Positive Values, Reflective Transformation, Calibre Credits™, professional standing, the Passport of Probity™ and Perpetual Calibre Development™.
IOWL participates in the OECD Future of Education and Skills 2040 conversation, engaging with other admitted stakeholders around the future of education, capability, agency, attitudes and values in an AI-shaped world.
IOWL submits written evidence to the House of Commons Business and Trade Committee, subsequently published as PRO0162, advancing the Capability, Competency and Calibre proposition within the UK productivity and human-capital debate. Read the published evidence >
IOWL participates in the OECD Global Anti-Corruption & Integrity Forum in Paris, continuing the conversation across integrity, governance, competitiveness and organisational performance.
IOWL contributes Working Papers and engages directly with participating policymakers, academics, education leaders, multinational employers and other stakeholders across these connected domains. The purpose is to listen, exchange perspectives, contribute and continue testing the relevance of the Calibre proposition.
IOWL participates in the Annual Conference of the OECD Global Forum on Productivity, bringing the continuing Calibre conversation into a forum focused directly on productive performance.
IOWL is making the developed architecture available more widely to universities and employers as a practical route for developing, recognising, evidencing and sustaining Calibre alongside Capability and Competency.
Investment in education, skills, technology, infrastructure and technical capability is essential. IOWL's proposition is that these inputs do not by themselves determine the quality of judgement, behaviour and decisions through which capability is converted into productive performance.
IOWL uses the Drag–Flag–Lag–Drag effect to describe a recurring productivity problem. Performance can already be experiencing drag before a deficiency is recognised and flagged. Education, training and policy responses then take time to design, deliver and diffuse, creating a lag. By the time the intended Capability or Competency reaches the system, circumstances may have changed and new sources of drag may already be emerging.
Calibre adds a second question. Even when the required Capability and Competency arrive, what determines the quality of judgement with which they will be exercised? IOWL's response is to develop Calibre among people already in education and employment while sustaining it through Perpetual Calibre Development™ as roles, technologies and circumstances change.
IOWL therefore treats Calibre as a distinct human-development dimension to be developed alongside Capability and Competency rather than assumed to arise automatically from education, experience, seniority or technical expertise.
IOWL sees the same underlying issue appearing in different forms: high levels of Capability do not guarantee the quality of judgement with which that Capability is exercised.
IOWL does not contend that a deficit of Calibre was the sole cause of the global financial crisis. It treats the crisis as a powerful illustration that technically sophisticated people and institutions can possess substantial Capability and Competency while failures of judgement, stewardship, restraint and responsibility still produce profound consequences.
AI can expand human and organisational Capability at exceptional speed. IOWL argues that the productivity opportunity will partly depend on whether people retain the personal agency to question, interpret and take responsibility for automated outputs rather than progressively relinquishing judgement to them.
Explore AI & Calibre >Where graduates and professionals hold comparable qualifications, competencies and access to similar AI tools, IOWL argues that differentiation increasingly concerns how those capabilities are exercised: judgement, reliability, responsibility, values, discernment and effect on others.
Explore employability & Calibre >IOWL's Leadership Stool frames productive human performance through three mutually important dimensions.
The proposition is not that Calibre replaces skills, technology or competence. It is that increasing capability without developing the quality governing its use leaves an important dimension of productive performance underdeveloped.
The proposition is supported by a continuing development and recognition architecture rather than a single course or one-off intervention.
A structured values architecture and development approach intended to strengthen values-governed judgement, reflection and application.
Explore Positive Value Leadership >Development moves beyond exposure to concepts by requiring reflection on judgement, behaviour, application and anticipated impact.
Explore transformation and recognition >Eligible assessed pathways connect Calibre development to bounded evidence and professional recognition rather than leaving the Calibre dimension entirely implicit.
Explore assessed pathways >Calibre development is treated as continuing work as role, responsibility, capability, technology and context change.
Explore PCD >IOWL provides different deployment routes for education and work, while keeping the same underlying distinction between Capability, Competency and Calibre.
Academic attainment can evidence knowledge and capability. IOWL provides a parallel route through which students can encounter, develop and progressively evidence Calibre while building a continuing relationship with Perpetual Calibre Development.
Employers invest heavily in skills, systems and technical competence. IOWL provides a complementary Calibre route spanning recruitment, onboarding, workforce development, progression and leadership responsibility.
IOWL distinguishes independent external context, IOWL observed evidence, research propositions and protected methodology. The public record is designed so journalists, universities, employers and researchers can examine what is claimed and what remains to be tested.
The Calibre Briefing provides reporting angles across productivity, employability, AI, Positive Values, governance and trust, together with terminology, source trails, chronology and interview routes. Professor Noel Ferguson is available for interview and comment on the longer Calibre development journey, IOWL's engagement across education, integrity and productivity, and the move into wider university and employer deployment ahead of and during the OECD Global Forum on Productivity annual conference.
Universities, employers, governments and strategic partners can contact IOWL to explore how Calibre development may sit alongside existing capability, competency and workforce-development systems.