One defined Positive Values framework for every country, culture and context. The 24 Values and six Exemplars remain consistent; people learn how to exercise them where they find themselves in life.
Yes. PVL is designed to be globally applicable and locally deployable. Its 24 Positive Values are defined as a common foundation for judgement, conduct and positive impact. Their meanings remain consistent as people move between countries, cultures, organisations, responsibilities and stages of life.
PVL is IOWL’s framework for leadership and positive impact. People can engage with its defined Values from religious or non-religious backgrounds. The global alignment matrix explores recognisable connections across traditions and contemporary frameworks, each considered in its own context.
IOWL takes a politically agnostic approach to PVL and Perpetual Calibre Development (PCD). Leadership is examined through conduct, judgement, the responsible use of power and resources, and its effects on people and the wider world. The same 24 defined Values and six Principles apply across countries and systems of governance.
The Values have been purposefully selected to form an efficacious and usable foundation for positive impact personally, organisationally, societally and globally. The model connects the quality of a person's choices with their effects on other people, institutions, communities and the wider world.
The design ambition is broad recognition: a person encountering the framework in any country, culture or context should be able to see a sensible, constructive foundation in it. They may wish to add further positive values. Those additions can enrich the foundation while retaining all 24 defined Values and the six integrated Exemplars.
The developmental task is to explore which Values are most challenging to exercise in the circumstances a person actually faces, and to develop the judgement and agency needed to live them. The learner's circumstances are the setting in which the defined Values must be exercised.
There is a useful parallel with glocalisation: a global foundation put to work in a local setting. In PVL, local deployment concerns faithful explanation, relevant examples, accessible learning and the practical exercise of the Values. The 24 definitions and six Principles provide the common reference throughout.
| Element | The common foundation | The local task |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning | The same 24 defined Positive Values and six Principle statements. | Explain or translate them as faithfully as possible; check that the intended commitment survives translation. |
| Interpretation | The defined Value remains the explicit reference for judging conduct. | Ask how the person understands the situation; examine language, relationships and assumptions without stereotyping. |
| Development | A commitment to developing and exercising the whole framework. | Identify which Values are more challenging in this person's present life, role, country or culture. |
| Action | The same positive commitments guide judgement and conduct. | Choose credible actions that meet those commitments within the actual circumstances. |
| Verification | Use the same Values and Principles to evaluate reasons, conduct and consequences. | Check evidence and affected people's experience; do not mistake unfamiliar expression for absence of a Value. |
| Reflection | Examine conduct and consequences against the defined Values. | Learn from the experience and strengthen future action as circumstances change. |
PVL does not treat local approval or established custom as sufficient to make conduct positive. It makes its normative commitments explicit through 24 defined Values and six Principles, then tests conduct and consequences against the same reference. Cultural difference is a fact to investigate, not a licence to dispense with the framework.
Equally, a familiar cultural expression must not become the only acceptable demonstration of a Value. Direct and indirect communication, public and private questioning, and individual and collective contributions can serve comparable positive purposes. PVL asks what was meant, done and experienced before reaching judgement.
Local deployment preserves the framework. It does not authorise a local version of the definitions, the removal of inconvenient Values or the use of custom to excuse conduct that conflicts with the common baseline.
Recognition is not the same as interpretation; interpretation is not the same as conduct. People may recognise Honesty, Humility, Questioning or Equitability as positive yet use different words, expectations and forms of behaviour to express them. A shared word alone does not guarantee a shared understanding; an unfamiliar behaviour does not prove that a Value is absent.
IOWL's aim is to address two different risks at once: ethical relativism, in which conduct is treated as justified merely because a group accepts it, and contextual misunderstanding, in which a culturally familiar style is incorrectly treated as the only valid way of living a Value.
The mistake: “It is acceptable here, therefore it must be positive.”
PVL's response: keep the full set of defined Values and Principles as the common normative reference. Consider the individual's reasons, available evidence, conduct, relevant rights and responsibilities, and foreseeable or actual consequences; do not equate custom with ethical justification.
The mistake: “It is unfamiliar to me, therefore the Value is missing.”
PVL's response: ask what a person meant, why that form of conduct was chosen, who could participate and how others experienced it. Distinguish the intended ethical commitment from the culturally shaped expression, without presuming that any one nationality or tradition has a uniform practice.
Begin with the authoritative wording of the relevant PVL Value and its Exemplar Principle. Do not change it to suit convenience or local preference.
Explore language, intent, history, social relationships and the individual's own account. Check translations rather than assuming identical connotations.
Look at what the person actually does, what alternatives exist and which voices or perspectives may have been overlooked.
Test evidence, likely and actual consequences, impacts on others, and tensions with other PVL Values. Remain willing to revise an initial interpretation.
These hypothetical situations illustrate possibilities, not established descriptions of how whole countries, cultural groups or traditions behave. In each case, either expression might be positive, inadequate or harmful depending on the facts.
| PVL Value | Possible expression A | Possible expression B | The common ethical test |
|---|---|---|---|
| HonestyProbity | A direct, public and factually accurate correction. | A truthful, carefully framed private correction. | Is the account accurate, trustworthy and free from deception or material concealment? Is any confidentiality legitimate? |
| HumourPotency | Light-hearted humour during group discussion. | Gentle humour in a trusted one-to-one relationship. | Is it culturally and contextually appropriate, constructive and free from humiliation or exclusion? |
| Culturally AwarePlanet | Asking an individual explicitly about their assumptions and preferences. | Building understanding through observation and considered dialogue over time. | Have we examined our own assumptions and taken genuine steps to understand this person's perceptions, rather than relying on a group stereotype? |
| HumilityPeople | Openly admitting limitations and seeking criticism. | Demonstrating restraint and quietly inviting others' insights. | Is there self-awareness, perspective-taking, openness and an absence of unwarranted self-importance? |
| QuestioningPerception | Challenging a proposal in a group meeting. | Asking substantive questions privately or through an appropriate intermediary. | Is intellectual curiosity encouraged, can concerns genuinely be raised, and is diversity of thought considered? |
| CollaborativeParticipation | A structured, individual-led working group with explicit contributions. | A relationship-led process built through extended collective consultation. | Are relationships developed across boundaries and is the work genuinely directed towards positive outcomes for all? |
A boundary matters: cultural understanding cannot automatically excuse deception, cruelty, unjust exclusion or avoidable harm. Nor does a difference of manner prove unethical conduct. The issue is whether a credible, evidence-informed application of the complete PVL framework supports the judgement.
Jacques Derrida challenges assumptions that words and texts carry a single, context-free interpretation. His work on deconstruction can prompt IOWL to ask whose assumptions guide the reading of a Value and what its conventional expression leaves out. It does not establish that every interpretation is equally defensible or that PVL's 24 Values have been empirically validated. [57]
Hermeneutics provides another perspective: how language, history and pre-understanding shape our interpretations of another person's words or conduct. It encourages clarification rather than projecting our own customary meaning onto others. [58]
Shalom H. Schwartz's cross-cultural research offers a complementary empirical approach to studying common value structures and differences in priorities. His findings concern Schwartz's constructs, not validation of PVL's distinct set of 24 Values. [59]
Ethical relativism itself has several philosophical meanings. Observing that cultures differ is not logically the same as claiming that moral justification depends entirely on local acceptance. IOWL's response is an explicit practical and normative position: its common framework provides a basis for assessment, while its claimed global applicability remains open to critical investigation. [56]
PVL is IOWL’s defined framework. Its Values can be considered alongside a wide range of cultural traditions, faiths, philosophies and public frameworks. The matrix places those comparisons on equal terms: each row identifies a particular source and context.
A comparison shows where a concern is recognisable elsewhere. It does not make that tradition the foundation of PVL, require its beliefs, or imply its endorsement. The 24 definitions and six Principles remain the common reference.
The comparisons concern the selected behaviours and values. They carry no endorsement of a source organisation’s wider political, religious or philosophical positions.
These are qualitative judgements about alignment with the defined Value, based on the selected evidence. They are not scores for countries or cultures. A close connection concerns a central behaviour; a partial connection covers a specific aspect; an indirect connection needs an additional interpretive step.
The selection spans African regions, Asia, Europe, the Americas, Australia, Arctic and Pacific communities, with an international environmental framework applying in Antarctica. Each account keeps its own identity and scope.
This edition: 37 traditions and frameworks · 888 intersections reviewed · 507 supported connections · 381 reviewed without a clear connection · 0 not assessed.
R means reviewed: no clear connection in the selected passages. It does not mean a tradition lacks, rejects or cannot support a Value. R is a review outcome, not a weaker alignment grade. “Not assessed” is reserved for work without a completed review. Source coverage varies; the matrix cannot rank traditions or infer population behaviour.
Expand the matrix to see all 24 Value columns at once. Hover or focus a square for a summary; click or tap for the evidence and its limits. Use the arrow keys to move between squares. Column colours identify the six PVL Exemplars; square colours identify the alignment category.
Showing all 37 traditions and frameworks, with all 24 Values.
No traditions or frameworks match that search. Clear the search to restore the global selection.
Each assessment compares the cited passage with the official PVL definition, rather than relying on a shared word alone. Close, partial and indirect describe the closeness of the connection. They do not express a statistical probability, the importance of the Value in a culture, or the quality of a tradition.
A fourth outcome records completed reviews without a clear connection. R means that the selected evidence does not support assigning C, P or I. It is not opposition, an absence claim about the whole tradition, or an extra weak-alignment category. Narrow practical sources naturally support fewer connections than broad ethical texts.
The notes separate source evidence, IOWL’s interpretation and the boundary of the claim. This is an illustrative editorial mapping, not an exhaustive systematic review, an independent expert consensus or empirical validation of PVL. All intersections in this edition have a recorded source-bounded review. Wider sources and community or scholarly review may extend or revise the comparisons while the PVL definitions remain fixed.
This global selection includes sources associated with Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, South America and Oceania, Arctic communities, and international environmental cooperation in Antarctica. Countries contain diverse communities, and traditions cross borders. A row never represents every person from its country, community or faith.
Read the four Values within each Exemplar together and refer to its full Principle below. The matrix does not separately rate or validate the six integrated Principles.
Not assessed is reserved for an intersection without a completed review. There are no such cells in this edition. A completed review without sufficient support is explicitly marked R.
These notes also make the comparisons available without interactive pop-ups. Each link identifies the source and passage.
West Africa · Ghana · Kwame Gyekye’s account · Authored philosophical account
Selection reviewed: Selected Akan maxims and Gyekye’s philosophical interpretation, especially sections 3–9. The author’s argument does not represent every African philosophy. [28]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Consequences for human welfare
Why this connects: Considering effects on wellbeing is relevant to deciding responsibly.
Boundary of the comparison: A fact-based process using all four Perception Values is not supplied.
Kwame Gyekye · African Ethics, sections 3–9: character, humanity, reciprocity and duties (opens in a new tab) [28]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with regulation of emotions, thoughts and positive conduct under pressure.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [28]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Character expressed in conduct
Why this connects: The relation between character and deeds supports consistency in moral action.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL’s full account of methods, measures and outcomes is wider.
Kwame Gyekye · African Ethics, sections 3–9: character, humanity, reciprocity and duties (opens in a new tab) [28]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Truthfulness and honesty
Why this connects: Truthfulness is among the conduct associated with human welfare.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete PVL definition is not independently reproduced.
Kwame Gyekye · African Ethics, sections 3–9: character, humanity, reciprocity and duties (opens in a new tab) [28]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with sustained effort despite obstacles or discouragement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [28]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Character and relationships
Why this connects: Moral character expressed towards others is relevant to ethical relationships.
Boundary of the comparison: Truthful self-concepts and leadership legitimacy are not directly developed.
Kwame Gyekye · African Ethics, sections 3–9: character, humanity, reciprocity and duties (opens in a new tab) [28]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with motivation created through a leader’s conduct and example.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [28]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [28]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Avoiding harm to welfare
Why this connects: Concern for others’ welfare connects with prevention of harm.
Boundary of the comparison: Specific cleanliness or disease-prevention behaviours are outside this selection.
Kwame Gyekye · African Ethics, sections 3–9: character, humanity, reciprocity and duties (opens in a new tab) [28]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [28]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with awareness of one’s own standpoint and curiosity about another person’s.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [28]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Concern beyond one’s community
Why this connects: Moral concern extending to distant people connects with global responsibility.
Boundary of the comparison: Interrelationships among nations are not separately analysed.
Kwame Gyekye · African Ethics, sections 3–9: character, humanity, reciprocity and duties (opens in a new tab) [28]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Limits of self-sufficiency
Why this connects: Recognising dependence on others can challenge self-importance.
Boundary of the comparison: The full multidimensional PVL account is not given.
Kwame Gyekye · African Ethics, sections 3–9: character, humanity, reciprocity and duties (opens in a new tab) [28]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Sympathy for another’s situation
Why this connects: Responding to another’s distress supports attention to their experience.
Boundary of the comparison: Sympathy is not automatically understanding within their own frame of reference.
Kwame Gyekye · African Ethics, sections 3–9: character, humanity, reciprocity and duties (opens in a new tab) [28]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Compassion and human worth
Why this connects: Kindness and regard for a person’s humanity are central connections.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL additionally makes self- and social-awareness explicit.
Kwame Gyekye · African Ethics, sections 3–9: character, humanity, reciprocity and duties (opens in a new tab) [28]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Help where it is needed
Why this connects: Need-sensitive support connects with proportional attention and resources.
Boundary of the comparison: The account is not a complete allocation method for opportunities.
Kwame Gyekye · African Ethics, sections 3–9: character, humanity, reciprocity and duties (opens in a new tab) [28]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Recognising another’s need
Why this connects: Responsiveness to distress presupposes noticing another person’s situation.
Boundary of the comparison: The source does not define an active observation practice.
Kwame Gyekye · African Ethics, sections 3–9: character, humanity, reciprocity and duties (opens in a new tab) [28]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with curiosity and diversity of thought when seeking clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [28]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Requests for mutual assistance
Why this connects: Requests and responses offer a practical setting for two-way communication.
Boundary of the comparison: Participative decisions and feedback are not the focus.
Kwame Gyekye · African Ethics, sections 3–9: character, humanity, reciprocity and duties (opens in a new tab) [28]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [28]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with helping another person develop skills, attributes or performance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [28]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Being willing to help
Why this connects: Willingness to respond when another needs help is relevant to availability.
Boundary of the comparison: The timing, places and means of dialogue are not explicitly specified.
Kwame Gyekye · African Ethics, sections 3–9: character, humanity, reciprocity and duties (opens in a new tab) [28]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Interdependence and reciprocity
Why this connects: Maintaining reciprocal relationships connects with personal networks.
Boundary of the comparison: The comparison does not establish modern strategic networking.
Kwame Gyekye · African Ethics, sections 3–9: character, humanity, reciprocity and duties (opens in a new tab) [28]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Reciprocal mutual aid
Why this connects: Working with others to meet needs closely connects with constructive shared outcomes.
Boundary of the comparison: The account’s community obligations remain distinct from PVL’s full wording.
Kwame Gyekye · African Ethics, sections 3–9: character, humanity, reciprocity and duties (opens in a new tab) [28]
North Africa · Morocco · UNESCO’s local account · Community practices
Selection reviewed: Selected resource-management and water-sharing practices in the High Atlas, Anti-Atlas and southern Morocco. These practices do not stand for all Amazigh ethical thought. [30]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Resource cycles and shared rules
Why this connects: Decisions informed by environmental conditions connect with considered resource use.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL’s complete decision process is not described.
UNESCO · Agdal rules, Tanast water sharing, and knowledge transmission (opens in a new tab) [30]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with regulation of emotions, thoughts and positive conduct under pressure.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [30]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Commitments to resource rules
Why this connects: Honouring a communal pact offers a setting for consistent conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: Compliance alone does not establish acting for the right reason.
UNESCO · Agdal rules, Tanast water sharing, and knowledge transmission (opens in a new tab) [30]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with truthful, trustworthy and straightforward conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [30]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Sustaining practices under scarcity
Why this connects: Maintaining resource practices during scarcity offers a context for persistence.
Boundary of the comparison: The source does not directly examine individual responses to discouragement.
UNESCO · Agdal rules, Tanast water sharing, and knowledge transmission (opens in a new tab) [30]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with ethical leadership relationships, truthful self-understanding and openness to followers.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [30]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Example of elders and practitioners
Why this connects: Visible stewardship may encourage others to sustain responsible practice.
Boundary of the comparison: Motivation through a leader’s example remains an interpretation.
UNESCO · Agdal rules, Tanast water sharing, and knowledge transmission (opens in a new tab) [30]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [30]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Conserving forests and water
Why this connects: Resource protection directly connects with prevention of planetary harm.
Boundary of the comparison: The comparison concerns ecological protection rather than the whole health definition.
UNESCO · Agdal rules, Tanast water sharing, and knowledge transmission (opens in a new tab) [30]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [30]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Situated knowledge and transmission
Why this connects: Awareness of inherited practice connects with understanding one’s cultural standpoint.
Boundary of the comparison: Understanding another individual’s beliefs is not fully specified.
UNESCO · Agdal rules, Tanast water sharing, and knowledge transmission (opens in a new tab) [30]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Climate and biodiversity effects
Why this connects: Local stewardship has wider planetary consequences.
Boundary of the comparison: The practitioners’ personal understanding of international interrelationships is not established.
UNESCO · Agdal rules, Tanast water sharing, and knowledge transmission (opens in a new tab) [30]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Learning from elders
Why this connects: Receiving knowledge from others offers a context for acknowledging limits.
Boundary of the comparison: The absence of self-importance is not directly stated.
UNESCO · Agdal rules, Tanast water sharing, and knowledge transmission (opens in a new tab) [30]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with understanding experience within another person’s frame of reference.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [30]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Sustaining community livelihoods
Why this connects: Protecting people’s means of living offers a concern related to wellbeing.
Boundary of the comparison: Kindness and social intelligence are not explicitly defined.
UNESCO · Agdal rules, Tanast water sharing, and knowledge transmission (opens in a new tab) [30]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Equitable access to resources
Why this connects: Shared access rules connect with proportional resources and opportunities.
Boundary of the comparison: Water entitlements and customary participation need scrutiny; universal inclusion is not assumed.
UNESCO · Agdal rules, Tanast water sharing, and knowledge transmission (opens in a new tab) [30]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Attention to ecological cycles
Why this connects: Observing resource conditions for protection is a central PVL behaviour.
Boundary of the comparison: The source concerns specific environmental settings.
UNESCO · Agdal rules, Tanast water sharing, and knowledge transmission (opens in a new tab) [30]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with curiosity and diversity of thought when seeking clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [30]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Assemblies and shared decisions
Why this connects: Discussing communal rules connects with participative decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: The account does not show that every affected person has equal voice.
UNESCO · Agdal rules, Tanast water sharing, and knowledge transmission (opens in a new tab) [30]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Knowledge from environmental experience
Why this connects: Empirical observation informing practice connects with an evidenced view.
Boundary of the comparison: The source does not establish independent validation of every inherited claim.
UNESCO · Agdal rules, Tanast water sharing, and knowledge transmission (opens in a new tab) [30]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Intergenerational teaching
Why this connects: Helping younger people learn practices connects with developing skills.
Boundary of the comparison: Optimising individual performance is not its sole or stated aim.
UNESCO · Agdal rules, Tanast water sharing, and knowledge transmission (opens in a new tab) [30]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with availability through appropriate times, places and means for two-way engagement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [30]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Community relationships
Why this connects: Maintaining relationships among users and generations connects with networks.
Boundary of the comparison: The broader strategic and international reach is not specified.
UNESCO · Agdal rules, Tanast water sharing, and knowledge transmission (opens in a new tab) [30]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Collective management
Why this connects: Joint stewardship of shared resources is a central collaborative behaviour.
Boundary of the comparison: The comparison does not endorse every customary arrangement.
UNESCO · Agdal rules, Tanast water sharing, and knowledge transmission (opens in a new tab) [30]
South America · Peru · a contemporary institutional account · Institutional account of community practices
Selection reviewed: The selected explanations of reciprocal help and collective community work. Wider Andean philosophies and the performance of the present-day programme are not assessed. [34]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with considered decisions informed by analysis and available facts.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [34]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with regulation of emotions, thoughts and positive conduct under pressure.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [34]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with consistent principled action for the right reasons despite circumstances.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [34]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with truthful, trustworthy and straightforward conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [34]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with sustained effort despite obstacles or discouragement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [34]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with ethical leadership relationships, truthful self-understanding and openness to followers.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [34]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with motivation created through a leader’s conduct and example.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [34]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [34]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with behaviour that protects health or prevents harm to people and the planet.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [34]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [34]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with awareness of one’s own standpoint and curiosity about another person’s.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [34]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with responsibility to a global community and awareness of interrelationships.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [34]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with self-understanding, openness, perspective-taking and absence of self-importance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [34]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with understanding experience within another person’s frame of reference.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [34]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Mutual assistance
Why this connects: Helping others connects with the kindness dimension of Humanity.
Boundary of the comparison: Social intelligence and rejection of cruelty are not fully defined by mutual aid alone.
Peru Ministry of Development and Social Inclusion · Paragraph describing ancestral ayni and minka (opens in a new tab) [34]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Benefit for the community
Why this connects: Shared benefit offers a route to discussing access to resources.
Boundary of the comparison: The description does not establish proportional provision to all individuals.
Peru Ministry of Development and Social Inclusion · Paragraph describing ancestral ayni and minka (opens in a new tab) [34]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with active attention to oneself, other people or the environment for protection and improvement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [34]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with curiosity and diversity of thought when seeking clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [34]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Coordinated shared work
Why this connects: Reciprocal work offers a practical setting for two-way coordination.
Boundary of the comparison: The passage does not expressly describe feedback or shared decisions.
Peru Ministry of Development and Social Inclusion · Paragraph describing ancestral ayni and minka (opens in a new tab) [34]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [34]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with helping another person develop skills, attributes or performance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [34]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Responding with assistance
Why this connects: Being available to help is related to being approachable.
Boundary of the comparison: Specific arrangements for dialogue remain outside the selected description.
Peru Ministry of Development and Social Inclusion · Paragraph describing ancestral ayni and minka (opens in a new tab) [34]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Reciprocal relationships
Why this connects: Maintaining relationships of help connects with personal networks.
Boundary of the comparison: The selected passage does not extend to every strategic or international boundary.
Peru Ministry of Development and Social Inclusion · Paragraph describing ancestral ayni and minka (opens in a new tab) [34]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Collective community work
Why this connects: Shared work for community benefit is a central collaborative behaviour.
Boundary of the comparison: The source does not make every instance of customary work automatically positive.
Peru Ministry of Development and Social Inclusion · Paragraph describing ancestral ayni and minka (opens in a new tab) [34]
North America · Seven Generations Education Institute · Community educational account
Selection reviewed: This educational account of the Seven Grandfather Teachings; not all Indigenous traditions. [11]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Wisdom is associated with vision and the constructive use of a natural gift.
Why this connects: This offers a related concern with using one’s capacities constructively.
Boundary of the comparison: It does not establish PVL’s full requirement for considered, fact-based analysis.
Seven Generations Education Institute · Wisdom (opens in a new tab) [11]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Courage amid fear
Why this connects: Facing fear while protecting others connects with constructive conduct in difficulty.
Boundary of the comparison: Courage is not a complete definition of emotional and cognitive regulation.
Seven Generations Education Institute · Seven Grandfather Teachings: named teachings and mentorship note (opens in a new tab) [11]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Virtue in the way one lives
Why this connects: Putting moral character into everyday conduct supports consistency.
Boundary of the comparison: The source does not enumerate PVL’s methods, measures and outcomes.
Seven Generations Education Institute · Seven Grandfather Teachings: named teachings and mentorship note (opens in a new tab) [11]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Honesty is described through living correctly and virtuously.
Why this connects: This connects with the moral-character and conduct dimensions of PVL Honesty.
Boundary of the comparison: The selected account has its own meaning of Honesty; identical definitions of truthfulness are not assumed.
Seven Generations Education Institute · Honesty (opens in a new tab) [11]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with sustained effort despite obstacles or discouragement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [11]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Knowing oneself and living accordingly
Why this connects: Self-understanding expressed in conduct connects with truthful self-concepts.
Boundary of the comparison: Leadership legitimacy and followers’ input are not fully specified.
Seven Generations Education Institute · Seven Grandfather Teachings: named teachings and mentorship note (opens in a new tab) [11]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with motivation created through a leader’s conduct and example.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [11]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [11]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Respect for living things
Why this connects: Care towards creation connects with prevention of harm beyond oneself.
Boundary of the comparison: The selected teachings are not a clinical standard.
Seven Generations Education Institute · Seven Grandfather Teachings: named teachings and mentorship note (opens in a new tab) [11]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [11]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Learning a named way of life
Why this connects: Reflection on inherited teachings offers a context for awareness of standpoint.
Boundary of the comparison: Curiosity about another person’s beliefs is not explicitly defined.
Seven Generations Education Institute · Seven Grandfather Teachings: named teachings and mentorship note (opens in a new tab) [11]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with responsibility to a global community and awareness of interrelationships.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [11]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Humility places the person within a wider circle of life.
Why this connects: This challenges inflated self-importance and supports perspective beyond oneself.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL also specifies self-understanding and openness; these are not all assessed here.
Seven Generations Education Institute · Humility (opens in a new tab) [11]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with understanding experience within another person’s frame of reference.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [11]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Love and respect guide relationships with others.
Why this connects: These support the kindness dimension of Humanity.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete social-intelligence definition is broader than this selected connection.
Seven Generations Education Institute · Love and respect (opens in a new tab) [11]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Attention to others’ needs
Why this connects: Respecting another’s needs offers a connection with fair attention.
Boundary of the comparison: Proportional resources and opportunity for all are not fully specified.
Seven Generations Education Institute · Seven Grandfather Teachings: named teachings and mentorship note (opens in a new tab) [11]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with active attention to oneself, other people or the environment for protection and improvement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [11]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with curiosity and diversity of thought when seeking clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [11]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Limits on what one claims
Why this connects: Speaking within the bounds of experience supports responsible exchange.
Boundary of the comparison: The teaching does not prescribe feedback or shared decisions.
Seven Generations Education Institute · Seven Grandfather Teachings: named teachings and mentorship note (opens in a new tab) [11]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Limits of one’s experience
Why this connects: Recognising the bounds of what one can claim is relevant to warranted understanding.
Boundary of the comparison: Personal experience alone is not independent validation of facts.
Seven Generations Education Institute · Seven Grandfather Teachings: named teachings and mentorship note (opens in a new tab) [11]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: One-to-one cultural mentorship
Why this connects: The institution’s mentorship offer illustrates help with cultural development.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a contemporary educational application, not one of the seven named teachings.
Seven Generations Education Institute · Seven Grandfather Teachings: named teachings and mentorship note (opens in a new tab) [11]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Contact with an Elder
Why this connects: A stated route to one-to-one mentorship illustrates availability for engagement.
Boundary of the comparison: The offer is within the institution’s student context rather than universal access.
Seven Generations Education Institute · Seven Grandfather Teachings: named teachings and mentorship note (opens in a new tab) [11]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Reciprocal respect
Why this connects: Reciprocal relationships offer a context for personal connections.
Boundary of the comparison: Cross-boundary network development is not explicitly prescribed.
Seven Generations Education Institute · Seven Grandfather Teachings: named teachings and mentorship note (opens in a new tab) [11]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Peaceful reciprocal relationships
Why this connects: Respect and reciprocity offer a foundation for constructive joint work.
Boundary of the comparison: The source does not detail a cross-boundary working process.
Seven Generations Education Institute · Seven Grandfather Teachings: named teachings and mentorship note (opens in a new tab) [11]
Antarctica · Antarctic Treaty Environmental Protocol · International environmental framework
Selection reviewed: Selected Protocol articles on protection, planning, scientific information, monitoring, cooperation and inspections. This is an international framework applying in Antarctica, rather than an Indigenous tradition. [47]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Prior assessment and sufficient information
Why this connects: Considering information and likely impacts before action is a central judgement behaviour.
Boundary of the comparison: The Protocol concerns environmental activities rather than every leadership decision.
Antarctic Treaty Secretariat · Environmental Protocol, Articles 2–3, 6 and 10–15 (opens in a new tab) [47]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with regulation of emotions, thoughts and positive conduct under pressure.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [47]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Duties and compliance
Why this connects: Maintaining commitments and checking compliance connect with consistent action.
Boundary of the comparison: Legal compliance alone does not establish acting for the right reasons.
Antarctic Treaty Secretariat · Environmental Protocol, Articles 2–3, 6 and 10–15 (opens in a new tab) [47]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Reporting and inspection records
Why this connects: Making records available creates a setting for accountable disclosure.
Boundary of the comparison: The selected articles do not define all aspects of personal honesty.
Antarctic Treaty Secretariat · Environmental Protocol, Articles 2–3, 6 and 10–15 (opens in a new tab) [47]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with sustained effort despite obstacles or discouragement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [47]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with ethical leadership relationships, truthful self-understanding and openness to followers.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [47]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with motivation created through a leader’s conduct and example.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [47]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [47]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Preventing environmental harm
Why this connects: Planning and response to protect ecosystems connect with planetary harm prevention.
Boundary of the comparison: The framework is not a complete individual health or cleanliness definition.
Antarctic Treaty Secretariat · Environmental Protocol, Articles 2–3, 6 and 10–15 (opens in a new tab) [47]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Review in light of new knowledge
Why this connects: Reconsidering activities when knowledge changes supports receptiveness to evidence.
Boundary of the comparison: A fair hearing for intellectual opposition is not separately defined.
Antarctic Treaty Secretariat · Environmental Protocol, Articles 2–3, 6 and 10–15 (opens in a new tab) [47]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with awareness of one’s own standpoint and curiosity about another person’s.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [47]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Shared responsibility across countries
Why this connects: International responsibility for a shared environment is a central global connection.
Boundary of the comparison: The Protocol’s geographical scope remains Antarctica.
Antarctic Treaty Secretariat · Environmental Protocol, Articles 2–3, 6 and 10–15 (opens in a new tab) [47]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with self-understanding, openness, perspective-taking and absence of self-importance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [47]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with understanding experience within another person’s frame of reference.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [47]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Protection in shared activities
Why this connects: Responsible activity offers a related context for concern about wellbeing.
Boundary of the comparison: Self-awareness, social intelligence and kindness are not explicitly defined here.
Antarctic Treaty Secretariat · Environmental Protocol, Articles 2–3, 6 and 10–15 (opens in a new tab) [47]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with proportional attention, resources and opportunities for all persons.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [47]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Regular environmental monitoring
Why this connects: Active monitoring for protection and improvement is a central observation behaviour.
Boundary of the comparison: The comparison concerns environmental monitoring rather than all social settings.
Antarctic Treaty Secretariat · Environmental Protocol, Articles 2–3, 6 and 10–15 (opens in a new tab) [47]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Assessment and expert advice
Why this connects: Examining proposals offers a setting for clarification and inquiry.
Boundary of the comparison: The selected articles do not explicitly encourage diversity of thought as a personal Value.
Antarctic Treaty Secretariat · Environmental Protocol, Articles 2–3, 6 and 10–15 (opens in a new tab) [47]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Exchange, consultation and notification
Why this connects: Information exchange and consultation support participative communication.
Boundary of the comparison: The framework does not define every personal feedback behaviour.
Antarctic Treaty Secretariat · Environmental Protocol, Articles 2–3, 6 and 10–15 (opens in a new tab) [47]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Scientific information and monitoring
Why this connects: Using sufficient information and monitoring to inform action closely connects with an evidenced view.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a practical environmental information standard, not validation of PVL.
Antarctic Treaty Secretariat · Environmental Protocol, Articles 2–3, 6 and 10–15 (opens in a new tab) [47]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Education and training
Why this connects: Cooperation in training offers a context for developing others.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete focus on personal attributes and optimal performance is not specified.
Antarctic Treaty Secretariat · Environmental Protocol, Articles 2–3, 6 and 10–15 (opens in a new tab) [47]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Access for observers
Why this connects: Providing access to people and records creates a particular route for scrutiny and exchange.
Boundary of the comparison: Inspection access is narrower than general personal availability for dialogue.
Antarctic Treaty Secretariat · Environmental Protocol, Articles 2–3, 6 and 10–15 (opens in a new tab) [47]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: International coordination
Why this connects: Maintaining links among participating organisations connects with cross-boundary networks.
Boundary of the comparison: The source does not prescribe every personal or operational networking practice.
Antarctic Treaty Secretariat · Environmental Protocol, Articles 2–3, 6 and 10–15 (opens in a new tab) [47]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Joint protection and response
Why this connects: Cooperation in research, planning and response is a central collaborative behaviour.
Boundary of the comparison: The comparison concerns specified obligations and practices, not proof of perfect implementation.
Antarctic Treaty Secretariat · Environmental Protocol, Articles 2–3, 6 and 10–15 (opens in a new tab) [47]
Europe / Mediterranean · selected Nicomachean Ethics passages · Ethical philosophy
Selection reviewed: Books II, IV and VI in W. D. Ross’s translation. Connections are selective; status distinctions and the account of pride are not treated as equivalent to PVL. [41] [42] [43]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Reasoned practical deliberation
Why this connects: Considering particulars and reasoning towards a good action closely connects with Judgement.
Boundary of the comparison: The source distinguishes practical wisdom from scientific knowledge; exact epistemic identity is not claimed.
Aristotle · VI.5, 7–11: practical wisdom, particulars and deliberation (opens in a new tab) [43]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Governed anger
Why this connects: Responding with appropriate temper connects closely with regulating emotion and conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: The ancient account of the mean is not a replacement for PVL’s definition.
Aristotle · IV.1 and IV.5–8: giving, temper, truth, friendliness and wit (opens in a new tab) [42]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Character expressed in choices
Why this connects: Choosing good action for its own sake connects with principled consistency.
Boundary of the comparison: The source’s account of virtue is not identical to PVL’s fixed definitions.
Aristotle · II.1–4: learning, practice, character and motives (opens in a new tab) [41]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Truthfulness without pretence
Why this connects: Truthful self-presentation and rejection of pretence support central Honesty behaviours.
Boundary of the comparison: The selected account is not the complete PVL definition.
Aristotle · IV.1 and IV.5–8: giving, temper, truth, friendliness and wit (opens in a new tab) [42]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Practice in character development
Why this connects: Repeated constructive practice supports sustained development.
Boundary of the comparison: The selected account does not make every persistent course of action good.
Aristotle · II.1–4: learning, practice, character and motives (opens in a new tab) [41]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Truthful self-presentation
Why this connects: Avoiding boastfulness and false presentation connects with truthful self-concepts.
Boundary of the comparison: Followers’ input and modern leadership legitimacy are not fully addressed.
Aristotle · IV.1 and IV.5–8: giving, temper, truth, friendliness and wit (opens in a new tab) [42]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with motivation created through a leader’s conduct and example.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [41] [42] [43]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Considerate wit
Why this connects: Balancing amusement with appropriateness and avoiding hurt is a central connection.
Boundary of the comparison: The passage does not independently establish team motivation or creativity outcomes.
Aristotle · IV.1 and IV.5–8: giving, temper, truth, friendliness and wit (opens in a new tab) [42]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Proportion and bodily health
Why this connects: Its health analogy offers a related concern with sustaining health.
Boundary of the comparison: An analogy about virtue is not a general harm-prevention practice.
Aristotle · II.1–4: learning, practice, character and motives (opens in a new tab) [41]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [41] [42] [43]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with awareness of one’s own standpoint and curiosity about another person’s.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [41] [42] [43]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with responsibility to a global community and awareness of interrelationships.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [41] [42] [43]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Accurate self-appraisal
Why this connects: Realistic appraisal of oneself connects with the self-understanding dimension.
Boundary of the comparison: The passage praises greatness of soul and criticises undue self-depreciation. This differs from an absence of self-importance; the limited overlap does not erase that tension.
Aristotle · IV.3: pride, self-appraisal and undue self-depreciation (opens in a new tab) [42]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Sensitivity to others’ pleasure and pain
Why this connects: Considering another’s response offers a context for perspective-taking.
Boundary of the comparison: Friendliness is not equivalent to understanding within the other person’s frame of reference.
Aristotle · IV.1 and IV.5–8: giving, temper, truth, friendliness and wit (opens in a new tab) [42]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Consideration in relationships
Why this connects: Concern for the effects of one’s behaviour connects with social awareness and kindness.
Boundary of the comparison: The source includes ancient status distinctions that PVL does not adopt.
Aristotle · IV.1 and IV.5–8: giving, temper, truth, friendliness and wit (opens in a new tab) [42]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Giving proportionately and appropriately
Why this connects: Attention to amount, recipient and circumstances connects with proportional provision.
Boundary of the comparison: The ancient account does not establish opportunity for all persons; its exclusions are not endorsed.
Aristotle · IV.1 and IV.5–8: giving, temper, truth, friendliness and wit (opens in a new tab) [42]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Attention to particulars
Why this connects: Recognising the actual circumstances of action connects with purposeful attention.
Boundary of the comparison: Observation of all people and contexts is not fully specified.
Aristotle · VI.5, 7–11: practical wisdom, particulars and deliberation (opens in a new tab) [43]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Deliberation as inquiry
Why this connects: Investigating what should be done connects with clarification through inquiry.
Boundary of the comparison: Diversity of thought is not fully defined by this connection.
Aristotle · VI.5, 7–11: practical wisdom, particulars and deliberation (opens in a new tab) [43]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Truthful, considerate conversation
Why this connects: Responsible conversational conduct supports constructive dialogue.
Boundary of the comparison: Shared decisions and active feedback are not fully specified.
Aristotle · IV.1 and IV.5–8: giving, temper, truth, friendliness and wit (opens in a new tab) [42]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Experience and particulars
Why this connects: A decision grounded in relevant particulars connects with seeking an evidenced view.
Boundary of the comparison: Aristotle’s categories of knowledge differ from modern fact-validation practices.
Aristotle · VI.5, 7–11: practical wisdom, particulars and deliberation (opens in a new tab) [43]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Teaching and learning through practice
Why this connects: Guided development of habits and abilities connects with helping others improve.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete PVL focus on individual attributes and performance is wider.
Aristotle · II.1–4: learning, practice, character and motives (opens in a new tab) [41]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with availability through appropriate times, places and means for two-way engagement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [41] [42] [43]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Friendliness in social relations
Why this connects: Maintaining considerate relations offers a context for connections.
Boundary of the comparison: The passage does not prescribe broad personal or strategic network development.
Aristotle · IV.1 and IV.5–8: giving, temper, truth, friendliness and wit (opens in a new tab) [42]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with investment in relationships across boundaries for positive shared outcomes.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [41] [42] [43]
Iranian origins and worldwide · selected community texts · Faith teaching
Selection reviewed: Selected passages on consultation and one human family. They have their own theological and institutional context; the comparison does not adopt that wider programme. [39] [40]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Considering views before deciding
Why this connects: Weighing contributions supports considered decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: Consultative agreement is not itself validation of facts; the source recognises mistaken consensus.
Bahá’í Reference Library · Consultation, extracts 9–10, 13–14 and 18–21 (opens in a new tab) [39]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Calm, moderate discussion
Why this connects: Composure during disagreement closely connects with regulating responses.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL does not require the source’s religious practices.
Bahá’í Reference Library · Consultation, extracts 9–10, 13–14 and 18–21 (opens in a new tab) [39]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Purity of motive
Why this connects: Attention to motives connects with acting for the right reasons.
Boundary of the comparison: The source’s theological basis and institutional obligations remain distinct.
Bahá’í Reference Library · Consultation, extracts 9–10, 13–14 and 18–21 (opens in a new tab) [39]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Sincerity between participants
Why this connects: Sincere interaction supports a central relational aspect of Honesty.
Boundary of the comparison: The selected passages do not enumerate every form of deception in PVL.
Bahá’í Reference Library · Consultation, extracts 9–10, 13–14 and 18–21 (opens in a new tab) [39]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Patience in difficulties
Why this connects: Patient effort through difficulty connects with persistence.
Boundary of the comparison: The source locates this commitment within spiritual service.
Bahá’í Reference Library · Consultation, extracts 9–10, 13–14 and 18–21 (opens in a new tab) [39]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Openness in counsel
Why this connects: Respectful, sincere consideration of others’ input connects with ethical leadership relationships.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete modern account of legitimacy and truthful self-concepts is not defined.
Bahá’í Reference Library · Consultation, extracts 9–10, 13–14 and 18–21 (opens in a new tab) [39]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Conduct within a united group
Why this connects: The example set by cooperative participants may encourage others.
Boundary of the comparison: A measured motivational effect through leadership behaviour is not established.
Bahá’í Reference Library · Consultation, extracts 9–10, 13–14 and 18–21 (opens in a new tab) [39]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [39] [40]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Shared wellbeing
Why this connects: Interdependent wellbeing offers a context for taking harm to others seriously.
Boundary of the comparison: The metaphor of a body is not a clinical or environmental protection procedure.
Bahá’í International Community · Selected paragraphs: one human family and unity in diversity (opens in a new tab) [40]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Reconsidering one’s own view
Why this connects: Receiving a better-supported contribution without clinging to one’s own is a central connection.
Boundary of the comparison: The source also has institutional rules; this is a selected behavioural comparison.
Bahá’í Reference Library · Consultation, extracts 9–10, 13–14 and 18–21 (opens in a new tab) [39]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Unity in diversity
Why this connects: Understanding difference within a shared humanity supports cultural curiosity.
Boundary of the comparison: Individual cultural self-awareness is not fully specified.
Bahá’í International Community · Selected paragraphs: one human family and unity in diversity (opens in a new tab) [40]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Shared planetary responsibility
Why this connects: Responsibility within one interdependent human family closely connects with global mindedness.
Boundary of the comparison: The source’s religious basis is not a prerequisite for PVL.
Bahá’í International Community · Selected paragraphs: one human family and unity in diversity (opens in a new tab) [40]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Humility in consultation
Why this connects: Making room for other contributions directly challenges self-importance.
Boundary of the comparison: The full multidimensional PVL definition remains the baseline.
Bahá’í Reference Library · Consultation, extracts 9–10, 13–14 and 18–21 (opens in a new tab) [39]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Others’ distress affecting the whole
Why this connects: Awareness that another’s distress matters offers a related concern with empathy.
Boundary of the comparison: The passage does not directly prescribe entering that person’s frame of reference.
Bahá’í International Community · Selected paragraphs: one human family and unity in diversity (opens in a new tab) [40]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Courtesy and care in discussion
Why this connects: Considerate treatment connects with kindness and social awareness.
Boundary of the comparison: The comparison does not endorse every rule of the source’s institutional practice.
Bahá’í Reference Library · Consultation, extracts 9–10, 13–14 and 18–21 (opens in a new tab) [39]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Freedom to contribute
Why this connects: Allowing each participant to express a view connects with opportunity to participate.
Boundary of the comparison: The passage is about participants in a particular setting, not proportional provision to everyone.
Bahá’í Reference Library · Consultation, extracts 9–10, 13–14 and 18–21 (opens in a new tab) [39]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with active attention to oneself, other people or the environment for protection and improvement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [39] [40]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Investigating unresolved questions
Why this connects: Exploring a problem through different contributions supports intellectual curiosity.
Boundary of the comparison: Theological truth-seeking is not identical to PVL’s full approach.
Bahá’í Reference Library · Consultation, extracts 9–10, 13–14 and 18–21 (opens in a new tab) [39]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Consultation in decisions
Why this connects: Two-way discussion and consideration of contributions are central communication behaviours.
Boundary of the comparison: The source’s particular decision rules are not prescribed by PVL.
Bahá’í Reference Library · Consultation, extracts 9–10, 13–14 and 18–21 (opens in a new tab) [39]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Fallibility of majority opinion
Why this connects: Examining a view rather than assuming numbers make it correct supports scrutiny.
Boundary of the comparison: The passages do not provide a complete standard of qualified empirical facts.
Bahá’í Reference Library · Consultation, extracts 9–10, 13–14 and 18–21 (opens in a new tab) [39]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Counsel on practical problems
Why this connects: Helping someone work through a problem can support development.
Boundary of the comparison: A specific process of building individual skills and performance is not fully described.
Bahá’í Reference Library · Consultation, extracts 9–10, 13–14 and 18–21 (opens in a new tab) [39]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Making space for counsel
Why this connects: Allowing participants to contribute creates conditions for dialogue.
Boundary of the comparison: Technology and personal availability beyond the meeting are not specified.
Bahá’í Reference Library · Consultation, extracts 9–10, 13–14 and 18–21 (opens in a new tab) [39]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Strangers becoming associates
Why this connects: Creating relationships beyond existing circles connects with wider networks.
Boundary of the comparison: The passage does not describe all strategic or organisational networking.
Bahá’í Reference Library · Consultation, extracts 9–10, 13–14 and 18–21 (opens in a new tab) [39]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Helping one another’s projects
Why this connects: Joint practical support is a central collaborative behaviour.
Boundary of the comparison: Agreement is not treated as independent proof that an outcome is positive.
Bahá’í Reference Library · Consultation, extracts 9–10, 13–14 and 18–21 (opens in a new tab) [39]
Asia and worldwide · Pāli canon, SN 45.8 · Selected faith texts
Selection reviewed: Selected passages from SN 45.8 and DN 31 in the Pāli canon. The comparison includes reciprocal social duties while preserving the texts’ religious and historical contexts. [4] [48]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with considered decisions informed by analysis and available facts.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [4] [48]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Non-ill-will and sustained wholesome effort are explicit concerns.
Why this connects: These connect with regulating one’s responses and maintaining constructive conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL’s emotional and cognitive regulation is not equivalent to the Buddhist path.
Buddhist Pāli canon · Right intention and right effort (opens in a new tab) [4]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Conduct beyond anger and desire
Why this connects: Resisting motives that lead to harmful action supports principled consistency.
Boundary of the comparison: The religious account of right conduct remains distinct from PVL.
Buddhist Pāli canon · DN 31: friends, teachers and pupils, employers and workers (opens in a new tab) [48]
Close alignment
Source evidence: The text rejects false speech and taking what is not given.
Why this connects: These are clear points of contact with truthful conduct and the absence of theft.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete PVL definition includes further relational attributes.
Buddhist Pāli canon · Right speech and right action (opens in a new tab) [4]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Effort includes maintaining and developing wholesome states.
Why this connects: Maintaining constructive effort connects closely with steady persistence.
Boundary of the comparison: The spiritual purpose and account of wholesomeness remain the source’s own.
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Sincere friendship
Why this connects: Sincere and dependable relationships connect with ethical relational credibility.
Boundary of the comparison: Truthful self-concepts and leadership legitimacy are not fully specified.
Buddhist Pāli canon · DN 31: friends, teachers and pupils, employers and workers (opens in a new tab) [48]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Encouragement towards good conduct
Why this connects: Encouraging constructive action offers a connection with positive influence.
Boundary of the comparison: The passage does not fully define motivation through a leader’s example.
Buddhist Pāli canon · DN 31: friends, teachers and pupils, employers and workers (opens in a new tab) [48]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: The constraints on speech concern its truthfulness and effects on others.
Why this connects: These offer a way to examine whether a use of humour is appropriate.
Boundary of the comparison: The passage does not present humour, levity or team creativity as a positive value.
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Care during sickness
Why this connects: Practical care for people who are ill connects with health and harm prevention.
Boundary of the comparison: The selected duties are not a complete clinical standard.
Buddhist Pāli canon · DN 31: friends, teachers and pupils, employers and workers (opens in a new tab) [48]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [4] [48]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with awareness of one’s own standpoint and curiosity about another person’s.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [4] [48]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with responsibility to a global community and awareness of interrelationships.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [4] [48]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: A humble, teachable disposition
Why this connects: Making room for instruction connects with openness and modesty.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete PVL definition remains broader.
Buddhist Pāli canon · DN 31: friends, teachers and pupils, employers and workers (opens in a new tab) [48]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Sympathetic friendship
Why this connects: Responding to another’s difficulty connects with sensitivity to experience.
Boundary of the comparison: Sympathy is not necessarily understanding within the other person’s frame of reference.
Buddhist Pāli canon · DN 31: friends, teachers and pupils, employers and workers (opens in a new tab) [48]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Harmlessness and abstaining from killing are specified.
Why this connects: Rejecting cruelty is central to the PVL Humanity definition.
Boundary of the comparison: This does not establish all aspects of self-awareness or social intelligence.
Buddhist Pāli canon · Right intention and right action (opens in a new tab) [4]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Work suited to ability
Why this connects: Attention to ability, support and need connects with proportional provision.
Boundary of the comparison: Historical master–worker arrangements are not endorsed or adopted by PVL.
Buddhist Pāli canon · DN 31: friends, teachers and pupils, employers and workers (opens in a new tab) [48]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Mindfulness attends to body, feelings, mind and mental phenomena.
Why this connects: Attention to oneself offers a clear connection with the observant dimension of PVL.
Boundary of the comparison: Meditative practice and its purpose are not interchangeable with leadership observation.
Buddhist Pāli canon · Right mindfulness (opens in a new tab) [4]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with curiosity and diversity of thought when seeking clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [4] [48]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Speech should avoid falsehood, division and harshness.
Why this connects: Responsible speech supports constructive dialogue with others.
Boundary of the comparison: Feedback and participative decision-making are not specified by this passage.
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [4] [48]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Teaching for understanding
Why this connects: Developing knowledge, abilities and readiness closely connects with Coach.
Boundary of the comparison: The ancient educational context is not identical to modern coaching.
Buddhist Pāli canon · DN 31: friends, teachers and pupils, employers and workers (opens in a new tab) [48]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Hospitality and refuge
Why this connects: Being available when people need support connects with approachability.
Boundary of the comparison: Specific arrangements for two-way dialogue are not fully defined.
Buddhist Pāli canon · DN 31: friends, teachers and pupils, employers and workers (opens in a new tab) [48]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Introductions and friendships
Why this connects: Introducing learners to associates connects with building useful networks.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete strategic and international reach of PVL is not given.
Buddhist Pāli canon · DN 31: friends, teachers and pupils, employers and workers (opens in a new tab) [48]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Reciprocal help
Why this connects: Mutual help among people in different roles connects with shared positive outcomes.
Boundary of the comparison: Every historical role expectation is not treated as a PVL commitment.
Buddhist Pāli canon · DN 31: friends, teachers and pupils, employers and workers (opens in a new tab) [48]
South America · National Assembly of Ecuador · Public-policy account
Selection reviewed: A 2013 institutional account of the 2008 constitutional settlement, rather than all Andean thought. [12]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with considered decisions informed by analysis and available facts.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [12]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with regulation of emotions, thoughts and positive conduct under pressure.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [12]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with consistent principled action for the right reasons despite circumstances.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [12]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with truthful, trustworthy and straightforward conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [12]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with sustained effort despite obstacles or discouragement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [12]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with ethical leadership relationships, truthful self-understanding and openness to followers.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [12]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with motivation created through a leader’s conduct and example.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [12]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [12]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with behaviour that protects health or prevents harm to people and the planet.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [12]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [12]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: The account foregrounds a plurinational and intercultural society.
Why this connects: Recognition of different cultural perspectives is relevant to understanding another person’s standpoint.
Boundary of the comparison: A constitutional description does not itself demonstrate individual cultural self-awareness.
National Assembly of Ecuador · Plurinational and intercultural society (opens in a new tab) [12]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with responsibility to a global community and awareness of interrelationships.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [12]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with self-understanding, openness, perspective-taking and absence of self-importance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [12]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with understanding experience within another person’s frame of reference.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [12]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with self- and social-awareness, kindness and rejection of cruelty.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [12]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Social provision and inclusion feature in its account of Buen Vivir.
Why this connects: Attention to participation and provision connects with opportunity and resources for all.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a public-policy comparison; outcomes and proportional provision are not evaluated here.
National Assembly of Ecuador · Social priorities (opens in a new tab) [12]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with active attention to oneself, other people or the environment for protection and improvement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [12]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with curiosity and diversity of thought when seeking clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [12]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with dialogue, shared feedback and participation in decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [12]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [12]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with helping another person develop skills, attributes or performance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [12]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with availability through appropriate times, places and means for two-way engagement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [12]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with developing relationships across personal, organisational or wider boundaries.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [12]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with investment in relationships across boundaries for positive shared outcomes.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [12]
Worldwide · Philippians 2:3–4 · Selected faith texts
Selection reviewed: Selected New Testament passages: Philippians 2:3–4 and Romans 12:3–21. These are not a summary of every Christian tradition or interpretation. [9] [49]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with considered decisions informed by analysis and available facts.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [9] [49]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Patience and restraint
Why this connects: Responding constructively rather than retaliating connects with self-regulation.
Boundary of the comparison: The theological grounds remain distinct from PVL.
Christian New Testament · Romans 12:3–21 (opens in a new tab) [49]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Commitment to good conduct
Why this connects: Maintaining good conduct under pressure connects with principled consistency.
Boundary of the comparison: The passage does not articulate every method and outcome in the PVL definition.
Christian New Testament · Romans 12:3–21 (opens in a new tab) [49]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Sincere care and honest conduct
Why this connects: Sincerity and conduct worthy of trust connect with Honesty.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete definition is not independently reproduced.
Christian New Testament · Romans 12:3–21 (opens in a new tab) [49]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Patience through difficulty
Why this connects: Continuing constructively in hardship connects with persistence.
Boundary of the comparison: The spiritual purpose remains the source’s own.
Christian New Testament · Romans 12:3–21 (opens in a new tab) [49]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Care without pretence
Why this connects: Sincere relationships connect with the ethical relational dimension.
Boundary of the comparison: Followers’ input and leadership legitimacy are not fully described.
Christian New Testament · Romans 12:3–21 (opens in a new tab) [49]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Encouragement and diligent service
Why this connects: Constructive example and encouragement offer a context for motivation.
Boundary of the comparison: The passage does not establish a particular effect on followers.
Christian New Testament · Romans 12:3–21 (opens in a new tab) [49]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [9] [49]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Meeting basic needs
Why this connects: Providing food and drink offers a practical context for preventing harm.
Boundary of the comparison: The passage is not a general health or disease-prevention protocol.
Christian New Testament · Romans 12:3–21 (opens in a new tab) [49]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [9] [49]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with awareness of one’s own standpoint and curiosity about another person’s.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [9] [49]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with responsibility to a global community and awareness of interrelationships.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [9] [49]
Close alignment
Source evidence: The passage discourages self-importance and directs attention towards others.
Why this connects: This connects directly with Humility’s absence of self-importance and perspective-taking.
Boundary of the comparison: The passage’s theological setting remains distinct from PVL.
Christian New Testament · Philippians 2:3–4 (opens in a new tab) [9]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Other people’s interests are to receive attention.
Why this connects: Attending to another person is relevant to understanding their experience.
Boundary of the comparison: The passage does not fully articulate taking another person’s psychological frame of reference.
Christian New Testament · Philippians 2:4 (opens in a new tab) [9]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Concern extends beyond one’s own interests to those of others.
Why this connects: Regard for others supports kindness and social awareness.
Boundary of the comparison: Concern for another’s interests does not establish the entire Humanity definition.
Christian New Testament · Philippians 2:4 (opens in a new tab) [9]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Sharing according to need
Why this connects: Need-sensitive provision connects with proportional attention and resources.
Boundary of the comparison: The immediate community context is not identical to PVL’s all-persons requirement.
Christian New Testament · Romans 12:3–21 (opens in a new tab) [49]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with active attention to oneself, other people or the environment for protection and improvement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [9] [49]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with curiosity and diversity of thought when seeking clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [9] [49]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Encouragement and peaceful relations
Why this connects: Encouragement offers a setting for constructive exchange.
Boundary of the comparison: Feedback and participative decisions are not explicitly described.
Christian New Testament · Romans 12:3–21 (opens in a new tab) [49]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [9] [49]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Teaching and encouragement
Why this connects: Helping others through teaching connects with development.
Boundary of the comparison: A complete method for improving personal skills and performance is not supplied.
Christian New Testament · Romans 12:3–21 (opens in a new tab) [49]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Hospitality
Why this connects: Making room for people connects with being approachable.
Boundary of the comparison: Personal availability through particular times and methods is not fully specified.
Christian New Testament · Romans 12:3–21 (opens in a new tab) [49]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Interdependent relationships
Why this connects: Relationships among different members connect with personal networks.
Boundary of the comparison: The global and strategic dimensions of Connected remain wider.
Christian New Testament · Romans 12:3–21 (opens in a new tab) [49]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Different contributions to a whole
Why this connects: Complementary contributions connect with constructive shared work.
Boundary of the comparison: A group’s agreement alone does not establish a positive outcome.
Christian New Testament · Romans 12:3–21 (opens in a new tab) [49]
East Asia and wider communities · Analects 16–17 · Ethical philosophy
Selection reviewed: Selected sayings in James Legge’s translation; not the whole Confucian tradition. [3]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Careful perception, inquiry and consideration of consequences appear together.
Why this connects: These are several of the inputs to a considered PVL judgement.
Boundary of the comparison: The saying is not a statement of PVL’s full evidence standard.
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Anger calls for consideration of the difficulties it may cause.
Why this connects: Pausing before reacting connects with regulating emotion and behaviour.
Boundary of the comparison: The full PVL definition also concerns managing thoughts across circumstances.
Close alignment
Source evidence: Prospective gain is considered in relation to righteousness.
Why this connects: This connects with doing what is right despite personal advantage.
Boundary of the comparison: Righteousness has its own Confucian meaning; conceptual identity is not claimed.
Close alignment
Source evidence: Sincerity in speech and conduct is commended.
Why this connects: Sincerity and truthful conduct are central to PVL Honesty.
Boundary of the comparison: This does not establish every attribute in the longer PVL definition.
Confucius · Analects 16.10 and 17.6 (opens in a new tab) [3]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with sustained effort despite obstacles or discouragement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [3]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Sincerity is connected with trust.
Why this connects: Truthful relationships offer a connection with the ethical relational core of Authenticity.
Boundary of the comparison: Modern leadership legitimacy, follower input and truthful self-concepts are not all specified.
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Conduct that wins others’ trust
Why this connects: Earnest and generous conduct connects with positive influence through example.
Boundary of the comparison: Motivational outcomes are not measured or fully defined.
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [3]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with behaviour that protects health or prevents harm to people and the planet.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [3]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [3]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with awareness of one’s own standpoint and curiosity about another person’s.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [3]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with responsibility to a global community and awareness of interrelationships.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [3]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Learning through informed friends
Why this connects: Recognising value in others’ knowledge offers a route beyond self-sufficiency.
Boundary of the comparison: The selected sayings do not fully define absence of self-importance.
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with understanding experience within another person’s frame of reference.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [3]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Generosity and kindness
Why this connects: Kind treatment supports a central Humanity dimension.
Boundary of the comparison: The full self- and social-awareness definition is wider.
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with proportional attention, resources and opportunities for all persons.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [3]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Seeing clearly and hearing distinctly receive deliberate attention.
Why this connects: Attentive perception is a clear behavioural connection with Observant.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL extends this attention across contexts and towards protection and improvement.
Close alignment
Source evidence: Doubt is a reason to ask questions.
Why this connects: Seeking clarification is central to PVL Questioning.
Boundary of the comparison: The passage does not fully specify encouraging diversity of thought.
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with dialogue, shared feedback and participation in decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [3]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Well-informed friends
Why this connects: Seeking informed company offers a context for improving what informs a decision.
Boundary of the comparison: Informed company is not by itself qualified validation of facts.
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Learning through friendship
Why this connects: Supportive relationships can provide a setting for development.
Boundary of the comparison: Specific help with skills and performance is not expressly described.
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with availability through appropriate times, places and means for two-way engagement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [3]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Beneficial friendships
Why this connects: Cultivating constructive friendships connects with personal networks.
Boundary of the comparison: The full organisational and international reach is not supplied.
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Constructive friendship
Why this connects: Relationships valued for mutual benefit offer a context for shared positive action.
Boundary of the comparison: The source does not fully define collaboration across boundaries.
Europe · selected competence descriptions · Selected institutional competences
Selection reviewed: Selected descriptions from chapter 6 of the 2016 competence model. The comparison concerns these components within the source’s wider framework. [15] [20]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Systematic analysis and evaluation inform judgements.
Why this connects: The connection concerns considered decisions supported by critical scrutiny.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL defines its own relationship between Judgement and the other Values.
Council of Europe · pp. 44–46: analytical and critical thinking (opens in a new tab) [20]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Principled adaptation includes regulating feelings and responses.
Why this connects: This closely connects with maintaining constructive behaviour under pressure.
Boundary of the comparison: Adaptability is not permission to change PVL’s definitions.
Council of Europe · pp. 47–48: flexibility and adaptability (opens in a new tab) [20]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Principled action despite pressure
Why this connects: Acting on considered commitments despite collective pressure closely connects with Integrity.
Boundary of the comparison: The selected competence is compared within its own wider framework.
Council of Europe · Chapter 6: responsibility, self-efficacy, self-understanding and knowledge of the world (opens in a new tab) [20]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with truthful, trustworthy and straightforward conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [15] [20]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Navigating obstacles
Why this connects: Confidence in tackling obstacles offers a related concern with persistence.
Boundary of the comparison: Self-efficacy is a belief about capability, not proof of sustained action.
Council of Europe · Chapter 6: responsibility, self-efficacy, self-understanding and knowledge of the world (opens in a new tab) [20]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Responsibility and self-understanding
Why this connects: Reflecting on oneself and acting responsibly support ethical credibility.
Boundary of the comparison: The full account of leader legitimacy and followers’ input remains wider.
Council of Europe · Chapter 6: responsibility, self-efficacy, self-understanding and knowledge of the world (opens in a new tab) [20]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with motivation created through a leader’s conduct and example.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [15] [20]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [15] [20]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with behaviour that protects health or prevents harm to people and the planet.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [15] [20]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Curiosity and engagement with different worldviews are specified.
Why this connects: This supports giving unfamiliar perspectives a serious hearing.
Boundary of the comparison: Respectful openness does not require accepting every claim.
Council of Europe · pp. 39–40: openness (opens in a new tab) [20]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Cultural curiosity accompanies critical understanding of oneself.
Why this connects: The combination connects with understanding both one’s own standpoint and another’s.
Boundary of the comparison: The two frameworks organise these concerns differently.
Council of Europe · pp. 39–40 and 51: openness and the self (opens in a new tab) [20]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Understanding a complex world
Why this connects: Attention to wider social and environmental interrelationships supports global awareness.
Boundary of the comparison: A complete personal global-responsibility commitment is not established by knowledge alone.
Council of Europe · Chapter 6: responsibility, self-efficacy, self-understanding and knowledge of the world (opens in a new tab) [20]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Critical self-understanding
Why this connects: Examining one’s own perspective connects with self-awareness and openness.
Boundary of the comparison: Absence of self-importance is not separately defined.
Council of Europe · Chapter 6: responsibility, self-efficacy, self-understanding and knowledge of the world (opens in a new tab) [20]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Understanding another person’s thoughts and feelings requires decentring.
Why this connects: This closely matches understanding experience within another person’s frame of reference.
Boundary of the comparison: The Council classifies empathy as a skill; PVL presents a defined Positive Value.
Council of Europe · pp. 46–47: empathy (opens in a new tab) [20]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Human dignity and concern for others
Why this connects: Regard for people’s dignity supports kindness and rejection of degrading treatment.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete PVL social-intelligence definition remains wider.
Council of Europe · Chapter 6: responsibility, self-efficacy, self-understanding and knowledge of the world (opens in a new tab) [20]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Fair treatment and equal opportunities extend across people’s backgrounds and circumstances.
Why this connects: Fair opportunity connects with the inclusive aim of Equitability.
Boundary of the comparison: Equal opportunity alone does not establish proportional provision of attention and resources.
Council of Europe · p. 38: justice, fairness and equality (opens in a new tab) [20]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Attention includes how others speak, behave and respond.
Why this connects: These behaviours connect closely with active attention to people and situations.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL also specifies protection, development and improvement as purposes.
Council of Europe · p. 46: listening and observing (opens in a new tab) [20]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Evaluation examines assumptions, arguments and alternative interpretations.
Why this connects: This supports seeking clarification through intellectual curiosity.
Boundary of the comparison: The comparison does not collapse Questioning into critical thinking alone.
Council of Europe · pp. 44–46: analytical and critical thinking (opens in a new tab) [20]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Communication includes exchange, explanation and intercultural mediation.
Why this connects: These practices enable dialogue and understanding across participants.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL additionally specifies feedback and participative decision-making.
Council of Europe · pp. 48–49: communicative skills (opens in a new tab) [20]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Claims, evidence and the reliability of material receive critical scrutiny.
Why this connects: This directly connects with seeking qualified facts for an evidenced view.
Boundary of the comparison: A correspondence in information practice is not endorsement of the PVL model.
Council of Europe · pp. 44–46: analytical and critical thinking (opens in a new tab) [20]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with helping another person develop skills, attributes or performance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [15] [20]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Methods for mutual understanding
Why this connects: Adapting communication offers a way to make exchange possible.
Boundary of the comparison: Personal availability through times and places is not fully specified.
Council of Europe · Chapter 6: responsibility, self-efficacy, self-understanding and knowledge of the world (opens in a new tab) [20]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Dialogue across cultural affiliations
Why this connects: Cross-community dialogue offers a setting for wider connections.
Boundary of the comparison: The source does not prescribe a complete personal networking practice.
Council of Europe · Chapter 6: responsibility, self-efficacy, self-understanding and knowledge of the world (opens in a new tab) [20]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Cooperation concerns joint activity and shared goals.
Why this connects: This supports constructive work and relationships with other people.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL explicitly extends relationships across boundaries towards positive outcomes for all.
Council of Europe · p. 49: co-operation skills (opens in a new tab) [20]
Chinese tradition and worldwide · Tao-te Ching · Ethical philosophy
Selection reviewed: Selected chapters of Part II in James Legge’s translation. [25]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with considered decisions informed by analysis and available facts.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [25]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Effective action is contrasted with rage.
Why this connects: This offers a connection with emotional regulation in difficult situations.
Boundary of the comparison: The chapter’s imagery and account of action remain distinct from PVL.
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Sincerity beyond reciprocity
Why this connects: Maintaining sincerity irrespective of another’s response supports consistency.
Boundary of the comparison: The full methods-and-outcomes definition is not stated.
Lao-tzu · Tao-te Ching II, chapters 49, 63, 66–67, 71 and 81 (opens in a new tab) [25]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Sincerity is maintained even towards those who are not sincere.
Why this connects: This connects with sincerity that is not merely conditional on others’ behaviour.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete PVL definition covers more than sincerity.
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Care at completion should match care at the beginning.
Why this connects: Sustaining care through a task connects with persistence.
Boundary of the comparison: This is not an instruction to persist regardless of evidence or consequences.
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Sincerity in dealings
Why this connects: Sincere relationships connect with ethical credibility.
Boundary of the comparison: Followers’ input and truthful self-concepts are not fully specified.
Lao-tzu · Tao-te Ching II, chapters 49, 63, 66–67, 71 and 81 (opens in a new tab) [25]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Leadership without precedence
Why this connects: A considerate leadership example offers a context for positive influence.
Boundary of the comparison: The selected passages do not define enthusiasm or motivation through example.
Lao-tzu · Tao-te Ching II, chapters 49, 63, 66–67, 71 and 81 (opens in a new tab) [25]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [25]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Gentleness and restraint
Why this connects: Restraining conduct that may injure offers a related concern with harm prevention.
Boundary of the comparison: The chapters are not a health or environmental protection procedure.
Lao-tzu · Tao-te Ching II, chapters 49, 63, 66–67, 71 and 81 (opens in a new tab) [25]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Recognising limits to knowing
Why this connects: Acknowledging that one does not know supports openness to further understanding.
Boundary of the comparison: A fair hearing for intellectual opposition is not fully described.
Lao-tzu · Tao-te Ching II, chapters 49, 63, 66–67, 71 and 81 (opens in a new tab) [25]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with awareness of one’s own standpoint and curiosity about another person’s.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [25]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with responsibility to a global community and awareness of interrelationships.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [25]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Leadership avoids precedence and recognises the limits of knowing.
Why this connects: These challenge self-importance and support awareness of one’s limitations.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a selected connection, not an equivalence between the two philosophies.
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with understanding experience within another person’s frame of reference.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [25]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Gentleness and kindness extend beyond reciprocal advantage.
Why this connects: These support the kindness and rejection-of-cruelty dimensions of Humanity.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL’s social-intelligence definition remains wider than this comparison.
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with proportional attention, resources and opportunities for all persons.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [25]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Awareness of one’s limits
Why this connects: Recognising one’s state of understanding connects with self-observation.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL also emphasises active attention to people and environment.
Lao-tzu · Tao-te Ching II, chapters 49, 63, 66–67, 71 and 81 (opens in a new tab) [25]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Recognising what is not known
Why this connects: Awareness of uncertainty can create a reason to seek clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: The source does not separately define intellectual questioning.
Lao-tzu · Tao-te Ching II, chapters 49, 63, 66–67, 71 and 81 (opens in a new tab) [25]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Care over words
Why this connects: Attention to the character of speech offers a setting for responsible dialogue.
Boundary of the comparison: Feedback and participative decisions are not explicitly prescribed.
Lao-tzu · Tao-te Ching II, chapters 49, 63, 66–67, 71 and 81 (opens in a new tab) [25]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [25]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with helping another person develop skills, attributes or performance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [25]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with availability through appropriate times, places and means for two-way engagement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [25]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with developing relationships across personal, organisational or wider boundaries.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [25]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with investment in relationships across boundaries for positive shared outcomes.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [25]
Southeast Asia · Philippines · UP CIDS scholarly account · Scholarly account of relational concepts
Selection reviewed: Enriquez’s relational model and the paper’s discussion of shared perception and community help, printed pp. 5–9. The paper reports competing definitions and evidence; no single account is attributed to every Filipino. [32]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with considered decisions informed by analysis and available facts.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [32]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with regulation of emotions, thoughts and positive conduct under pressure.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [32]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with consistent principled action for the right reasons despite circumstances.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [32]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with truthful, trustworthy and straightforward conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [32]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with sustained effort despite obstacles or discouragement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [32]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Relational trust
Why this connects: Developing trust offers a context for ethical leadership relationships.
Boundary of the comparison: Trust categories do not establish truthful self-concepts or openness by themselves.
University of the Philippines, Center for Integrative and Development Studies · Printed pp. 5–9: kapwa theory, relational modes and qualifications (opens in a new tab) [32]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with motivation created through a leader’s conduct and example.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [32]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [32]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Community help in hardship
Why this connects: Concern for people’s needs offers a connection with reducing harm.
Boundary of the comparison: The selected discussion does not establish a health practice or its effectiveness.
University of the Philippines, Center for Integrative and Development Studies · Printed pp. 5–9: kapwa theory, relational modes and qualifications (opens in a new tab) [32]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [32]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Insider context and interpretation
Why this connects: Examining how meanings are understood locally supports awareness of standpoint.
Boundary of the comparison: This scholarly discussion is not a complete personal cultural-awareness practice.
University of the Philippines, Center for Integrative and Development Studies · Printed pp. 5–9: kapwa theory, relational modes and qualifications (opens in a new tab) [32]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with responsibility to a global community and awareness of interrelationships.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [32]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Shared identity
Why this connects: Recognising oneself in relation to others can challenge isolated self-importance.
Boundary of the comparison: Absence of self-importance is an interpretation, not a synonym for kapwa.
University of the Philippines, Center for Integrative and Development Studies · Printed pp. 5–9: kapwa theory, relational modes and qualifications (opens in a new tab) [32]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Pakikiramdam and shared perception
Why this connects: Sensitivity to another person’s situation connects with perspective-taking.
Boundary of the comparison: The concepts retain meanings that are not identical to psychological empathy.
University of the Philippines, Center for Integrative and Development Studies · Printed pp. 5–9: kapwa theory, relational modes and qualifications (opens in a new tab) [32]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Shared humanity and relational care
Why this connects: Recognising another’s humanity supports kindness and social awareness.
Boundary of the comparison: Empirical accounts of exclusion complicate any claim of universal application in practice.
University of the Philippines, Center for Integrative and Development Studies · Printed pp. 5–9: kapwa theory, relational modes and qualifications (opens in a new tab) [32]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Community assistance
Why this connects: Mutual assistance connects with attending to people’s needs.
Boundary of the comparison: Boundaries between insiders and outsiders prevent assuming equal provision to all.
University of the Philippines, Center for Integrative and Development Studies · Printed pp. 5–9: kapwa theory, relational modes and qualifications (opens in a new tab) [32]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Sensitivity in relationships
Why this connects: Attending to interpersonal signals connects with observing others.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete protection and improvement purposes are not separately specified.
University of the Philippines, Center for Integrative and Development Studies · Printed pp. 5–9: kapwa theory, relational modes and qualifications (opens in a new tab) [32]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with curiosity and diversity of thought when seeking clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [32]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Modes of interpersonal engagement
Why this connects: Relational communication connects with engaged two-way exchange.
Boundary of the comparison: Feedback and shared decision authority are not established by every relational mode.
University of the Philippines, Center for Integrative and Development Studies · Printed pp. 5–9: kapwa theory, relational modes and qualifications (opens in a new tab) [32]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [32]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with helping another person develop skills, attributes or performance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [32]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Ways of entering relationships
Why this connects: Different modes of engagement offer a context for making contact possible.
Boundary of the comparison: Personal availability through suitable times and technologies is not directly prescribed.
University of the Philippines, Center for Integrative and Development Studies · Printed pp. 5–9: kapwa theory, relational modes and qualifications (opens in a new tab) [32]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Trust and involvement
Why this connects: Developing involvement and rapport connects with personal relationships.
Boundary of the comparison: The model is not equivalent to strategic or international networking.
University of the Philippines, Center for Integrative and Development Studies · Printed pp. 5–9: kapwa theory, relational modes and qualifications (opens in a new tab) [32]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Communal assistance
Why this connects: Helping people through shared efforts connects with positive joint outcomes.
Boundary of the comparison: The paper discusses complexity and limits; cooperation is not attributed to all interactions.
University of the Philippines, Center for Integrative and Development Studies · Printed pp. 5–9: kapwa theory, relational modes and qualifications (opens in a new tab) [32]
South Asia and worldwide · Bhagavad Gītā 16.1–2 · Selected faith texts
Selection reviewed: Two passages concerning qualities of character within a diverse global tradition. [7] [19]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Study and knowledge
Why this connects: Cultivating knowledge offers a foundation relevant to considered decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: Spiritual study is not equivalent to qualified factual validation.
Bhagavad Gītā · Bhagavad Gītā 16.1 (opens in a new tab) [19]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Restraint of anger is among the qualities commended.
Why this connects: This directly connects with one part of emotional regulation.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL’s full definition includes thought and positive behaviour across circumstances.
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Qualities expressed in conduct
Why this connects: Consistent exercise of the named qualities offers a context for integrity.
Boundary of the comparison: The verse does not itself define consistency across circumstances and methods.
Close alignment
Source evidence: Truthfulness is explicitly commended.
Why this connects: Truthful character is a central element of PVL Honesty.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete PVL definition includes additional behaviours and relationships.
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Persistence in knowledge and yoga is commended.
Why this connects: Sustained commitment offers a clear connection with steady persistence.
Boundary of the comparison: The verse has a spiritual setting and does not specify every task or difficulty in PVL.
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Straightforward conduct
Why this connects: Upright conduct offers a connection with ethical relational credibility.
Boundary of the comparison: Modern leadership legitimacy and followers’ input are not defined.
Bhagavad Gītā · Bhagavad Gītā 16.1 (opens in a new tab) [19]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with motivation created through a leader’s conduct and example.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [7] [19]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [7] [19]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Non-injury
Why this connects: Avoiding injury connects with the prevention-of-harm dimension.
Boundary of the comparison: The passage is not a clinical or environmental practice standard.
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [7] [19]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with awareness of one’s own standpoint and curiosity about another person’s.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [7] [19]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with responsibility to a global community and awareness of interrelationships.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [7] [19]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Modesty and gentleness appear among the listed qualities.
Why this connects: Modesty offers a connection with avoiding inflated self-importance.
Boundary of the comparison: Self-understanding and perspective-taking require separate examination.
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Compassion towards beings
Why this connects: Concern for another’s suffering supports attention to experience.
Boundary of the comparison: Compassion is not automatically understanding within the other’s frame of reference.
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Compassion and non-injury are specified.
Why this connects: These connect with kindness and rejection of cruelty.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete social-intelligence definition is not established by these terms.
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Giving
Why this connects: Charitable provision offers a setting for considering another’s need.
Boundary of the comparison: The verse does not specify proportional resources or opportunity for all persons.
Bhagavad Gītā · Bhagavad Gītā 16.1 (opens in a new tab) [19]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with active attention to oneself, other people or the environment for protection and improvement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [7] [19]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with curiosity and diversity of thought when seeking clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [7] [19]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Truthfulness and gentleness
Why this connects: Considerate truthful speech supports constructive dialogue.
Boundary of the comparison: Feedback and participative decision-making are not specified.
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [7] [19]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with helping another person develop skills, attributes or performance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [7] [19]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with availability through appropriate times, places and means for two-way engagement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [7] [19]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with developing relationships across personal, organisational or wider boundaries.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [7] [19]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with investment in relationships across boundaries for positive shared outcomes.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [7] [19]
International secular framework · Humanists International, 2022 · Contemporary ethical declaration
Selection reviewed: The declaration of this international humanist movement, rather than all secular perspectives. [22]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Reason and scientific inquiry are advocated for addressing problems.
Why this connects: These provide a strong connection with sound analysis and evidence-informed judgement.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL establishes its own defined relationship between Values.
Humanists International · Section 2 (opens in a new tab) [22]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with regulation of emotions, thoughts and positive conduct under pressure.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [22]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Ethical responsibility in action
Why this connects: Combining freedom with responsibility supports principled conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: The declaration’s wider worldview does not replace PVL’s fixed definitions.
Humanists International · Amsterdam Declaration 2022, sections 1–4, selected commitments (opens in a new tab) [22]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with truthful, trustworthy and straightforward conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [22]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Lifelong development
Why this connects: Continuing creative and ethical development supports persistence.
Boundary of the comparison: The passage does not detail every form of obstacle or discouragement.
Humanists International · Amsterdam Declaration 2022, sections 1–4, selected commitments (opens in a new tab) [22]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with ethical leadership relationships, truthful self-understanding and openness to followers.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [22]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with motivation created through a leader’s conduct and example.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [22]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [22]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Helping without harming
Why this connects: Avoiding harm and taking responsibility for nature connect with protection.
Boundary of the comparison: The declaration is not a particular health or cleanliness protocol.
Humanists International · Amsterdam Declaration 2022, sections 1–4, selected commitments (opens in a new tab) [22]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Views remain open to scrutiny and rethinking.
Why this connects: This supports a fair hearing for intellectual opposition.
Boundary of the comparison: The declaration’s secular worldview is not a required worldview for PVL.
Humanists International · Section 4 (opens in a new tab) [22]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Diversity and different beliefs
Why this connects: Engaging with people of different beliefs supports cultural curiosity.
Boundary of the comparison: The full personal self-awareness component is not separately specified.
Humanists International · Amsterdam Declaration 2022, sections 1–4, selected commitments (opens in a new tab) [22]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Responsibility extends to all humanity and future generations.
Why this connects: Responsibility beyond immediate boundaries connects closely with the global community dimension.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL also explicitly describes interrelationships among nations and peoples.
Humanists International · Section 1 (opens in a new tab) [22]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Human fallibility and the limits of knowledge are recognised.
Why this connects: Acknowledging limits supports Humility’s self-understanding and openness.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete PVL definition includes wider relational perspective-taking.
Humanists International · Sections 3–4 (opens in a new tab) [22]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Compassion and suffering
Why this connects: Attention to suffering connects with sensitivity to others’ experience.
Boundary of the comparison: The full frame-of-reference definition is not reproduced.
Humanists International · Amsterdam Declaration 2022, sections 1–4, selected commitments (opens in a new tab) [22]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Compassion and helping without harming underpin its ethical account.
Why this connects: These connect with kindness and resistance to cruelty.
Boundary of the comparison: The full social-intelligence dimension is not specified by this connection.
Humanists International · Section 1 (opens in a new tab) [22]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: The declaration rejects prejudice and supports development compatible with others’ rights.
Why this connects: These concerns support fair opportunity for persons.
Boundary of the comparison: It does not provide PVL’s complete definition of proportional provision.
Humanists International · Section 1 (opens in a new tab) [22]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Continuing observation
Why this connects: Observation used to improve understanding is a central PVL behaviour.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete protection and development purposes remain wider.
Humanists International · Amsterdam Declaration 2022, sections 1–4, selected commitments (opens in a new tab) [22]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Free inquiry and exchange of ideas are central commitments.
Why this connects: This supports intellectual curiosity and diversity of thought.
Boundary of the comparison: The wider worldview remains distinct from PVL’s normative foundation.
Humanists International · Sections 2 and 4 (opens in a new tab) [22]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Exchange of ideas
Why this connects: Free exchange supports active dialogue.
Boundary of the comparison: Participative decisions and feedback are not fully specified.
Humanists International · Amsterdam Declaration 2022, sections 1–4, selected commitments (opens in a new tab) [22]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Scientific inquiry, observation and continuing learning inform understanding.
Why this connects: These connect with testing and improving the factual basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: The framework does not independently validate PVL assessments.
Humanists International · Sections 2 and 4 (opens in a new tab) [22]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Cultivating human development
Why this connects: Commitment to development offers a context for helping others learn.
Boundary of the comparison: The declaration does not prescribe an individual coaching process.
Humanists International · Amsterdam Declaration 2022, sections 1–4, selected commitments (opens in a new tab) [22]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with availability through appropriate times, places and means for two-way engagement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [22]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Cooperation across beliefs
Why this connects: Developing relationships across beliefs connects with wider networks.
Boundary of the comparison: The personal, operational and strategic dimensions are not all defined.
Humanists International · Amsterdam Declaration 2022, sections 1–4, selected commitments (opens in a new tab) [22]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Cooperation across different beliefs aims at a better world.
Why this connects: This closely connects with relationships across boundaries for positive shared outcomes.
Boundary of the comparison: Shared values do not mean identical beliefs or institutional endorsement.
Humanists International · Section 4 (opens in a new tab) [22]
Southeast Asia · Indonesia · a 2020 cooperation initiative · Contemporary application of a community practice
Selection reviewed: The selected official account applies gotong royong to shared support for medical workers. It illustrates a practice in one setting, without establishing all Indonesian beliefs or evaluating clinical outcomes. [33]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Attention to practical needs
Why this connects: Matching support to workers’ circumstances offers a context for considered decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: The account does not demonstrate a complete evidence-based decision process.
Indonesia Ministry of Tourism and Creative Economy · 28 March 2020 account: shared facilities, cooperation and community help (opens in a new tab) [33]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with regulation of emotions, thoughts and positive conduct under pressure.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [33]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with consistent principled action for the right reasons despite circumstances.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [33]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with truthful, trustworthy and straightforward conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [33]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Continuing collective effort
Why this connects: An appeal to continue disciplined mutual support offers a setting for persistence.
Boundary of the comparison: The report does not evaluate whether effort was sustained despite obstacles.
Indonesia Ministry of Tourism and Creative Economy · 28 March 2020 account: shared facilities, cooperation and community help (opens in a new tab) [33]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with ethical leadership relationships, truthful self-understanding and openness to followers.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [33]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Appeal to share and help
Why this connects: A public example of mobilising assistance connects with encouraging constructive action.
Boundary of the comparison: The report does not establish the motivational effect on individual followers.
Indonesia Ministry of Tourism and Creative Economy · 28 March 2020 account: shared facilities, cooperation and community help (opens in a new tab) [33]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [33]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Protection of medical workers
Why this connects: Providing support during a health emergency connects with harm prevention.
Boundary of the comparison: This mapping neither recommends particular clinical measures nor assesses their effectiveness.
Indonesia Ministry of Tourism and Creative Economy · 28 March 2020 account: shared facilities, cooperation and community help (opens in a new tab) [33]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [33]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with awareness of one’s own standpoint and curiosity about another person’s.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [33]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with responsibility to a global community and awareness of interrelationships.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [33]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with self-understanding, openness, perspective-taking and absence of self-importance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [33]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with understanding experience within another person’s frame of reference.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [33]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Concern for human lives
Why this connects: Practical care for workers connects with kindness towards others.
Boundary of the comparison: The full self- and social-awareness definition is not given.
Indonesia Ministry of Tourism and Creative Economy · 28 March 2020 account: shared facilities, cooperation and community help (opens in a new tab) [33]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Support matched to need
Why this connects: Locating assistance around workers’ needs connects with proportional provision.
Boundary of the comparison: Universal access and actual distribution outcomes are not established.
Indonesia Ministry of Tourism and Creative Economy · 28 March 2020 account: shared facilities, cooperation and community help (opens in a new tab) [33]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with active attention to oneself, other people or the environment for protection and improvement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [33]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with curiosity and diversity of thought when seeking clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [33]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Coordination among partners
Why this connects: Organising joint support creates a practical need for information exchange.
Boundary of the comparison: Two-way feedback and participative decision-making are not directly described.
Indonesia Ministry of Tourism and Creative Economy · 28 March 2020 account: shared facilities, cooperation and community help (opens in a new tab) [33]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [33]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with helping another person develop skills, attributes or performance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [33]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Assistance in suitable places
Why this connects: Providing help where people can use it is related to accessibility.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL concerns personal availability for dialogue, not accommodation access alone.
Indonesia Ministry of Tourism and Creative Economy · 28 March 2020 account: shared facilities, cooperation and community help (opens in a new tab) [33]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Public and private partnerships
Why this connects: Connecting organisations for support links with cross-boundary networks.
Boundary of the comparison: The report is one initiative rather than a general account of personal networks.
Indonesia Ministry of Tourism and Creative Economy · 28 March 2020 account: shared facilities, cooperation and community help (opens in a new tab) [33]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Shared community effort
Why this connects: Partners contribute resources to a common protective purpose.
Boundary of the comparison: The comparison concerns the described arrangement rather than proven outcomes.
Indonesia Ministry of Tourism and Creative Economy · 28 March 2020 account: shared facilities, cooperation and community help (opens in a new tab) [33]
Arctic / North America · Nunavut’s public account · Community values in a public framework
Selection reviewed: The eight listed Inuit societal values, considered within Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit. The selection is not a statement about every Inuit person or community. [27]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Discussion and consensus
Why this connects: Considering matters together contributes to informed decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: Consensus alone does not establish that the underlying facts are sound.
Government of Nunavut · The eight listed Inuit societal values (opens in a new tab) [27]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with regulation of emotions, thoughts and positive conduct under pressure.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [27]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with consistent principled action for the right reasons despite circumstances.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [27]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with truthful, trustworthy and straightforward conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [27]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Practice and effort
Why this connects: Sustained practice provides a connection with persistence in development.
Boundary of the comparison: Specific obstacles or discouragement are not described.
Government of Nunavut · The eight listed Inuit societal values (opens in a new tab) [27]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with ethical leadership relationships, truthful self-understanding and openness to followers.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [27]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Fostering good spirits
Why this connects: A welcoming environment may help encourage others.
Boundary of the comparison: The source does not explicitly attribute motivation to a leader’s example.
Government of Nunavut · The eight listed Inuit societal values (opens in a new tab) [27]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [27]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Care for land and animals
Why this connects: Protecting the environment connects with the planetary harm-prevention dimension.
Boundary of the comparison: Clinical cleanliness and the complete PVL definition are outside this passage.
Government of Nunavut · The eight listed Inuit societal values (opens in a new tab) [27]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Openness and discussion
Why this connects: Openness to people and discussion supports hearing other contributions.
Boundary of the comparison: A fair hearing for intellectual opposition is not fully specified.
Government of Nunavut · The eight listed Inuit societal values (opens in a new tab) [27]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Named Inuit ways of relating
Why this connects: Situated cultural knowledge offers a starting point for reflecting on standpoint.
Boundary of the comparison: Curiosity about another person’s beliefs is not explicitly defined.
Government of Nunavut · The eight listed Inuit societal values (opens in a new tab) [27]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with responsibility to a global community and awareness of interrelationships.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [27]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Learning through others
Why this connects: Mentoring and discussion make room for knowledge beyond oneself.
Boundary of the comparison: Absence of self-importance is an interpretation rather than an explicit statement.
Government of Nunavut · The eight listed Inuit societal values (opens in a new tab) [27]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with understanding experience within another person’s frame of reference.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [27]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Care for people
Why this connects: Respect and care connect with kindness in relationships.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete self- and social-awareness definition is not given.
Government of Nunavut · The eight listed Inuit societal values (opens in a new tab) [27]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Welcome and inclusion
Why this connects: An inclusive welcome connects with opportunities for participation.
Boundary of the comparison: Proportional allocation of resources to every person is not specified.
Government of Nunavut · The eight listed Inuit societal values (opens in a new tab) [27]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Observation in skill development
Why this connects: Purposeful observation is an explicit route to development.
Boundary of the comparison: The connection is strongest in learning rather than every leadership context.
Government of Nunavut · The eight listed Inuit societal values (opens in a new tab) [27]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Discussion and resourcefulness
Why this connects: Discussion may create opportunities to explore different approaches.
Boundary of the comparison: Intellectual curiosity and clarification are not separately named.
Government of Nunavut · The eight listed Inuit societal values (opens in a new tab) [27]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Discussion in decisions
Why this connects: Discussion and consensus provide a central participative communication behaviour.
Boundary of the comparison: The source does not prescribe every feedback practice in PVL.
Government of Nunavut · The eight listed Inuit societal values (opens in a new tab) [27]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [27]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Mentoring and skill development
Why this connects: Helping someone develop through mentoring closely connects with Coach.
Boundary of the comparison: No identity between the full frameworks is implied.
Government of Nunavut · The eight listed Inuit societal values (opens in a new tab) [27]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Open, welcoming engagement
Why this connects: Welcome creates conditions in which people can engage.
Boundary of the comparison: Specific arrangements for availability, time and technology are not supplied.
Government of Nunavut · The eight listed Inuit societal values (opens in a new tab) [27]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Relationships and common causes
Why this connects: Developing relationships for common concerns connects with personal networks.
Boundary of the comparison: The full operational and international reach of PVL is not described.
Government of Nunavut · The eight listed Inuit societal values (opens in a new tab) [27]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Working for a common cause
Why this connects: Cooperation for a shared purpose is a central behavioural connection.
Boundary of the comparison: The source retains its own community meaning and scope.
Government of Nunavut · The eight listed Inuit societal values (opens in a new tab) [27]
Worldwide · Qur’an 4:135 and 49:13 · Selected faith texts
Selection reviewed: Selected Qur’anic passages: 4:135, 49:13, 49:6, 3:159 and 5:2. The comparison does not summarise all Islamic ethics, law or lived practice. [5] [6] [50] [51] [52]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Checking news before acting
Why this connects: Verification before potentially harmful action connects with considered decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: The verse does not enumerate the full PVL decision process.
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Gentleness under difficulty
Why this connects: Rejecting harshness and responding constructively connect with emotional regulation.
Boundary of the comparison: The full management of thoughts across circumstances is not defined here.
Close alignment
Source evidence: Justice is upheld even against personal or family interests.
Why this connects: Maintaining principle despite advantage or pressure closely connects with PVL Integrity.
Boundary of the comparison: The verse’s religious basis is distinct from the PVL definition.
Close alignment
Source evidence: Truthful testimony should resist distortion and evasion.
Why this connects: This provides a clear point of contact with truthful, straightforward conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: The passage does not define every attribute within PVL Honesty.
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with sustained effort despite obstacles or discouragement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [5] [6] [50] [51] [52]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Consulting those being led
Why this connects: Gentleness and attention to others’ contributions connect with ethical leadership relationships.
Boundary of the comparison: Truthful self-concepts and the complete legitimacy definition are not specified.
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with motivation created through a leader’s conduct and example.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [5] [6] [50] [51] [52]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [5] [6] [50] [51] [52]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Preventing uninformed harm
Why this connects: Checking a claim to avoid harm connects with one part of harm prevention.
Boundary of the comparison: The verse is not a clinical or cleanliness practice.
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [5] [6] [50] [51] [52]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Peoples and tribes are described in relation to knowing one another.
Why this connects: This supports curiosity about others across human differences.
Boundary of the comparison: The verse does not spell out PVL’s full requirement for cultural self-awareness.
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with responsibility to a global community and awareness of interrelationships.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [5] [6] [50] [51] [52]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with self-understanding, openness, perspective-taking and absence of self-importance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [5] [6] [50] [51] [52]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with understanding experience within another person’s frame of reference.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [5] [6] [50] [51] [52]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Rejection of hard-hearted treatment
Why this connects: Gentle treatment supports kindness and rejection of cruelty.
Boundary of the comparison: The full self- and social-awareness dimension is wider.
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Justice should not be biased by wealth or poverty.
Why this connects: Resisting partiality supports fair regard for all persons.
Boundary of the comparison: Impartial justice alone does not establish PVL’s full account of proportional resources and opportunity.
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with active attention to oneself, other people or the environment for protection and improvement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [5] [6] [50] [51] [52]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Verification of a report
Why this connects: Seeking clarification before acting supports inquiry.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete encouragement of diverse thought is not specified.
Close alignment
Source evidence: Consultation in decisions
Why this connects: Consulting other people is a central participative communication behaviour.
Boundary of the comparison: The source does not prescribe PVL’s complete feedback practice.
Close alignment
Source evidence: Verification before action
Why this connects: Checking information rather than acting on an unverified report is a central connection.
Boundary of the comparison: The source’s religious context remains distinct from PVL.
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with helping another person develop skills, attributes or performance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [5] [6] [50] [51] [52]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Opportunity to be consulted
Why this connects: Consultation creates a context in which people need to be able to engage.
Boundary of the comparison: Personal availability and the means of contact are not separately stated.
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Relations in constructive cooperation
Why this connects: Cooperation offers a setting for relationships beyond immediate self-interest.
Boundary of the comparison: Developing cross-boundary networks is not explicitly defined.
Qur’an · Qur’an 5:2, selected instructions on conduct and cooperation (opens in a new tab) [52]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Cooperation in good conduct
Why this connects: Working with others for a constructive purpose connects with collaboration.
Boundary of the comparison: The full definition’s investment across boundaries is not separately specified.
Qur’an · Qur’an 5:2, selected instructions on conduct and cooperation (opens in a new tab) [52]
South Asia and worldwide · JAINA accounts · Faith teaching
Selection reviewed: Selected community explanations of the vows and multiple perspectives. These include particular ascetic commitments and do not summarise every Jain interpretation or impose religious practices through PVL. [36] [37]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with considered decisions informed by analysis and available facts.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [36] [37]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Restraint of anger and fear
Why this connects: Managing impulses that undermine truthful conduct connects closely with self-regulation.
Boundary of the comparison: Ascetic practices and their religious purpose are not PVL requirements.
Federation of Jain Associations in North America · Explanations of non-harm, truth, non-stealing and restraint (opens in a new tab) [36]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Vows in thought and conduct
Why this connects: Keeping commitments across speech and action connects with consistent conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: The full PVL architecture of methods, measures and outcomes is not specified.
Federation of Jain Associations in North America · Explanations of non-harm, truth, non-stealing and restraint (opens in a new tab) [36]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Truth and non-stealing
Why this connects: Avoiding falsehood and theft supports central behaviours in Honesty.
Boundary of the comparison: The source permits silence to avoid harm; exact identity with PVL’s full definition is not assumed.
Federation of Jain Associations in North America · Explanations of non-harm, truth, non-stealing and restraint (opens in a new tab) [36]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Strict observance
Why this connects: Sustaining demanding commitments offers a context for persistence.
Boundary of the comparison: The selected passage does not explicitly discuss responding to discouragement.
Federation of Jain Associations in North America · Explanations of non-harm, truth, non-stealing and restraint (opens in a new tab) [36]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with ethical leadership relationships, truthful self-understanding and openness to followers.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [36] [37]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with motivation created through a leader’s conduct and example.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [36] [37]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Caution about joking and untruth
Why this connects: Its caution offers a constraint on humour that misleads or harms.
Boundary of the comparison: This passage does not affirm levity or team creativity as a positive purpose.
Federation of Jain Associations in North America · Explanations of non-harm, truth, non-stealing and restraint (opens in a new tab) [36]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Non-injury to living beings
Why this connects: Avoiding injury connects with the prevention-of-harm dimension.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a moral commitment, not a claim about clinical effectiveness or ritual purity.
Federation of Jain Associations in North America · Explanations of non-harm, truth, non-stealing and restraint (opens in a new tab) [36]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: More than one perspective
Why this connects: Recognising limits in a single perspective supports hearing other views.
Boundary of the comparison: The comparison does not mean every claim or behaviour is equally acceptable.
Federation of Jain Associations in North America · Non-absolutism and recognition of multiple perspectives (opens in a new tab) [37]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Awareness of perspective
Why this connects: Recognising that understanding has a standpoint offers a context for cultural reflection.
Boundary of the comparison: Personal cultural values and another person’s beliefs are not fully specified.
Federation of Jain Associations in North America · Non-absolutism and recognition of multiple perspectives (opens in a new tab) [37]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with responsibility to a global community and awareness of interrelationships.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [36] [37]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Restraint of ego
Why this connects: Checking ego supports the absence-of-self-importance dimension.
Boundary of the comparison: The full account of self-understanding and perspective-taking is wider.
Federation of Jain Associations in North America · Explanations of non-harm, truth, non-stealing and restraint (opens in a new tab) [36]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with understanding experience within another person’s frame of reference.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [36] [37]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Rejection of cruelty
Why this connects: Rejecting injury and oppression closely connects with abhorring cruelty.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL also explicitly requires social intelligence and kindness.
Federation of Jain Associations in North America · Explanations of non-harm, truth, non-stealing and restraint (opens in a new tab) [36]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Regard for living beings
Why this connects: Equal moral regard offers a related concern with fair treatment.
Boundary of the comparison: Proportional attention, resources and opportunity for all persons are not established.
Federation of Jain Associations in North America · Explanations of non-harm, truth, non-stealing and restraint (opens in a new tab) [36]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Attention to conduct
Why this connects: Care over thought, speech and action offers a role for self-observation.
Boundary of the comparison: An active observation method across contexts is not separately specified.
Federation of Jain Associations in North America · Explanations of non-harm, truth, non-stealing and restraint (opens in a new tab) [36]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Multiple facets of understanding
Why this connects: Considering alternative perspectives can support clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: The passage does not explicitly prescribe a practice of questioning.
Federation of Jain Associations in North America · Non-absolutism and recognition of multiple perspectives (opens in a new tab) [37]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Wholesome, considerate speech
Why this connects: Considerate truthfulness supports responsible dialogue.
Boundary of the comparison: Feedback and participation in decisions are not described.
Federation of Jain Associations in North America · Explanations of non-harm, truth, non-stealing and restraint (opens in a new tab) [36]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [36] [37]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with helping another person develop skills, attributes or performance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [36] [37]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with availability through appropriate times, places and means for two-way engagement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [36] [37]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with developing relationships across personal, organisational or wider boundaries.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [36] [37]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Living harmoniously with others
Why this connects: Avoiding harm creates a condition for constructive shared work.
Boundary of the comparison: Harmony alone does not establish cross-boundary collaboration.
Federation of Jain Associations in North America · Explanations of non-harm, truth, non-stealing and restraint (opens in a new tab) [36]
Asia · MEXT account of the Basic Act on Education · Educational purposes
Selection reviewed: The cited national educational aims, not a description of every Japanese person’s values. [14]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Seeking truth and developing broad knowledge are educational aims.
Why this connects: These provide inputs relevant to considered decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: The passage does not state PVL’s complete decision-making method.
Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology · Educational aims (opens in a new tab) [14]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with regulation of emotions, thoughts and positive conduct under pressure.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [14]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Responsibility and morality
Why this connects: Responsibility provides a context for consistent ethical conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: The goals do not themselves define the entire Integrity commitment.
Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology · Selected Basic Act education goals, Article 2(i)–(v) (opens in a new tab) [14]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with truthful, trustworthy and straightforward conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [14]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Hard work and the development of individual abilities are valued.
Why this connects: Sustained effort offers a connection with persistence.
Boundary of the comparison: Valuing work alone does not establish persistence through every kind of obstacle.
Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology · Educational aims (opens in a new tab) [14]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with ethical leadership relationships, truthful self-understanding and openness to followers.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [14]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with motivation created through a leader’s conduct and example.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [14]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [14]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Health and environmental preservation
Why this connects: Promoting health and protecting nature connect with prevention of harm.
Boundary of the comparison: Educational purposes do not establish actual behaviour or outcomes.
Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology · Selected Basic Act education goals, Article 2(i)–(v) (opens in a new tab) [14]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Wide-ranging knowledge and culture
Why this connects: Broad learning offers a context for receiving unfamiliar ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: A fair hearing for intellectual opposition is not explicitly defined.
Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology · Selected Basic Act education goals, Article 2(i)–(v) (opens in a new tab) [14]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Own culture and other countries
Why this connects: Attention to local culture alongside respect for others connects with standpoint awareness.
Boundary of the comparison: Individual beliefs and curiosity are not fully described.
Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology · Selected Basic Act education goals, Article 2(i)–(v) (opens in a new tab) [14]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Respect for other countries and contribution to international peace are included.
Why this connects: These directly connect with responsibility beyond national boundaries.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL also specifies awareness of complex global interrelationships.
Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology · Educational aims (opens in a new tab) [14]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with self-understanding, openness, perspective-taking and absence of self-importance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [14]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with understanding experience within another person’s frame of reference.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [14]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Respect for human dignity and life is affirmed.
Why this connects: Respect for persons is relevant to kindness and rejection of cruelty.
Boundary of the comparison: The full self- and social-awareness definition remains wider.
Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology · Educational aims (opens in a new tab) [14]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Individual dignity and equal regard
Why this connects: Respect for individuals and equality supports fair opportunity.
Boundary of the comparison: Proportional material provision for all persons is not specified.
Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology · Selected Basic Act education goals, Article 2(i)–(v) (opens in a new tab) [14]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with active attention to oneself, other people or the environment for protection and improvement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [14]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Seeking truth
Why this connects: Truth-seeking offers a purpose for clarification and inquiry.
Boundary of the comparison: The goals do not explicitly define diverse questioning behaviours.
Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology · Selected Basic Act education goals, Article 2(i)–(v) (opens in a new tab) [14]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with dialogue, shared feedback and participation in decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [14]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Knowledge and seeking truth
Why this connects: Developing knowledge offers a context for informed decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: The goals do not prescribe a full fact-validation method.
Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology · Selected Basic Act education goals, Article 2(i)–(v) (opens in a new tab) [14]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Developing individual abilities
Why this connects: Education that develops abilities connects with helping people improve.
Boundary of the comparison: The goals do not define every interpersonal coaching behaviour.
Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology · Selected Basic Act education goals, Article 2(i)–(v) (opens in a new tab) [14]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with availability through appropriate times, places and means for two-way engagement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [14]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with developing relationships across personal, organisational or wider boundaries.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [14]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Cooperation and contribution to society are explicit aims.
Why this connects: Shared constructive activity supports the collaborative concern.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL further specifies relationship-building across multiple boundaries.
Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology · Educational aims (opens in a new tab) [14]
Worldwide · Pirkei Avot 1:6 and 4:1 · Selected rabbinic teachings
Selection reviewed: Selected rabbinic sayings; not an account of all Jewish traditions or ethical teaching. [23] [24]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Learning from every person
Why this connects: Receiving knowledge from others can contribute to considered decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: Learning widely does not itself establish a fact-based decision method.
Jewish rabbinic tradition · Pirkei Avot 4:1 (opens in a new tab) [24]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Might is associated with mastery of one’s impulses.
Why this connects: Self-restraint offers a connection with regulating one’s responses.
Boundary of the comparison: The PVL definition also specifies constructive conduct across circumstances.
Jewish rabbinic tradition · Pirkei Avot 4:1 (opens in a new tab) [24]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with consistent principled action for the right reasons despite circumstances.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [23] [24]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with truthful, trustworthy and straightforward conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [23] [24]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with sustained effort despite obstacles or discouragement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [23] [24]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with ethical leadership relationships, truthful self-understanding and openness to followers.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [23] [24]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with motivation created through a leader’s conduct and example.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [23] [24]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [23] [24]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with behaviour that protects health or prevents harm to people and the planet.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [23] [24]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Wisdom is associated with learning from every person.
Why this connects: Recognising others as sources of knowledge supports receptivity.
Boundary of the comparison: This does not fully specify setting aside commitments to hear intellectual opposition.
Jewish rabbinic tradition · Pirkei Avot 4:1 (opens in a new tab) [24]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with awareness of one’s own standpoint and curiosity about another person’s.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [23] [24]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with responsibility to a global community and awareness of interrelationships.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [23] [24]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Learning is not restricted to people of higher status.
Why this connects: A willingness to learn from others challenges self-importance.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete PVL definition also includes self-understanding and perspective-taking.
Jewish rabbinic tradition · Pirkei Avot 4:1 (opens in a new tab) [24]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: A favourable approach to others
Why this connects: Suspending a harsh judgement can create room to consider another’s situation.
Boundary of the comparison: Favourable judgement is not itself understanding within their frame of reference.
Jewish rabbinic tradition · Pirkei Avot 1:6 (opens in a new tab) [23]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Honouring other people
Why this connects: Showing regard to other people supports kindness and dignity.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete social-intelligence definition is wider.
Jewish rabbinic tradition · Pirkei Avot 4:1 (opens in a new tab) [24]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Appreciation of others
Why this connects: Honouring people connects with providing appreciation beyond oneself.
Boundary of the comparison: Proportional resources and opportunities are not fully specified.
Jewish rabbinic tradition · Pirkei Avot 4:1 (opens in a new tab) [24]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with active attention to oneself, other people or the environment for protection and improvement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [23] [24]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Readiness to learn
Why this connects: Learning from others offers a setting for clarification and curiosity.
Boundary of the comparison: The saying does not explicitly describe a questioning practice.
Jewish rabbinic tradition · Pirkei Avot 4:1 (opens in a new tab) [24]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Learning through other people
Why this connects: Learning from others offers a context for two-way exchange.
Boundary of the comparison: Feedback and shared decisions are not directly prescribed.
Jewish rabbinic tradition · Pirkei Avot 4:1 (opens in a new tab) [24]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [23] [24]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: A teacher and a companion are commended.
Why this connects: The teaching relationship offers a context for another person’s development.
Boundary of the comparison: Seeking a teacher is not itself a definition of coaching or the duty to coach others.
Jewish rabbinic tradition · Pirkei Avot 1:6 (opens in a new tab) [23]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with availability through appropriate times, places and means for two-way engagement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [23] [24]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Companionship is treated as a relationship to cultivate.
Why this connects: Cultivating relationships connects with part of developing a personal network.
Boundary of the comparison: Cross-organisational and international networks are not specified.
Jewish rabbinic tradition · Pirkei Avot 1:6 (opens in a new tab) [23]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with investment in relationships across boundaries for positive shared outcomes.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [23] [24]
Amazonia / South America · Sarayaku, Ecuador · Community-authored account
Selection reviewed: The Sarayaku community’s own Living Jungle overview. Its account concerns relationships with the forest and safeguarding living beings; it does not speak for all Amazonian peoples. [35]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with considered decisions informed by analysis and available facts.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [35]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with regulation of emotions, thoughts and positive conduct under pressure.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [35]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Life philosophy and practice
Why this connects: A way of life guided by a stated philosophy offers a context for consistency.
Boundary of the comparison: The overview does not establish the full PVL Integrity definition.
Kichwa people of Sarayaku · Living Jungle overview and international presentation of the declaration (opens in a new tab) [35]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with truthful, trustworthy and straightforward conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [35]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Cultural continuity
Why this connects: Maintaining a way of life offers a setting in which persistence may matter.
Boundary of the comparison: The selected overview does not explicitly describe overcoming discouragement.
Kichwa people of Sarayaku · Living Jungle overview and international presentation of the declaration (opens in a new tab) [35]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with ethical leadership relationships, truthful self-understanding and openness to followers.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [35]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with motivation created through a leader’s conduct and example.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [35]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [35]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Safeguarding living beings
Why this connects: Protecting the forest and its inhabitants connects with prevention of planetary harm.
Boundary of the comparison: The worldview is not equated with clinical health or cleanliness.
Kichwa people of Sarayaku · Living Jungle overview and international presentation of the declaration (opens in a new tab) [35]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [35]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Roots and cultural identity
Why this connects: Understanding cultural identity connects with awareness of one’s standpoint.
Boundary of the comparison: The webpage does not fully describe understanding another person’s beliefs.
Kichwa people of Sarayaku · Living Jungle overview and international presentation of the declaration (opens in a new tab) [35]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: International presentation and shared concern
Why this connects: Taking a community proposal into international forums connects local responsibility with wider concerns.
Boundary of the comparison: Participation in forums alone does not establish the whole PVL definition.
Kichwa people of Sarayaku · Living Jungle overview and international presentation of the declaration (opens in a new tab) [35]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: People within a living world
Why this connects: Recognising human life within wider relationships offers a route beyond self-importance.
Boundary of the comparison: The source’s spiritual understanding remains distinct from the PVL definition.
Kichwa people of Sarayaku · Living Jungle overview and international presentation of the declaration (opens in a new tab) [35]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with understanding experience within another person’s frame of reference.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [35]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Welfare of living beings
Why this connects: Concern for wellbeing offers a related connection with care.
Boundary of the comparison: The specific self- and social-awareness dimensions are not defined here.
Kichwa people of Sarayaku · Living Jungle overview and international presentation of the declaration (opens in a new tab) [35]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with proportional attention, resources and opportunities for all persons.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [35]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with active attention to oneself, other people or the environment for protection and improvement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [35]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with curiosity and diversity of thought when seeking clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [35]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Sharing a declaration
Why this connects: Presenting the proposal to wider audiences connects with active communication.
Boundary of the comparison: Presentation alone does not demonstrate feedback or participative decisions.
Kichwa people of Sarayaku · Living Jungle overview and international presentation of the declaration (opens in a new tab) [35]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [35]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with helping another person develop skills, attributes or performance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [35]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with availability through appropriate times, places and means for two-way engagement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [35]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Connections through international forums
Why this connects: Building links beyond the community connects with wider networks.
Boundary of the comparison: The overview does not describe every personal or strategic networking behaviour.
Kichwa people of Sarayaku · Living Jungle overview and international presentation of the declaration (opens in a new tab) [35]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: A shared protection proposal
Why this connects: A common concern for protection can create a basis for joint work.
Boundary of the comparison: The overview does not document a particular collaborative working process.
Kichwa people of Sarayaku · Living Jungle overview and international presentation of the declaration (opens in a new tab) [35]
Oceania · Aotearoa New Zealand Ministry of Education · Community concepts in education
Selection reviewed: Whanaungatanga and manaakitanga in Kōwhiti Whakapae, with their particular Māori meanings. [10]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with considered decisions informed by analysis and available facts.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [10]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with regulation of emotions, thoughts and positive conduct under pressure.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [10]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with consistent principled action for the right reasons despite circumstances.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [10]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with truthful, trustworthy and straightforward conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [10]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with sustained effort despite obstacles or discouragement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [10]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Reciprocal relationships
Why this connects: Responsible reciprocal care offers a context for ethical relationships.
Boundary of the comparison: Truthful self-concepts and leadership legitimacy are not directly specified.
New Zealand Ministry of Education · Whanaungatanga and manaakitanga: educational explanation (opens in a new tab) [10]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Care and welcome
Why this connects: A caring example may encourage participation.
Boundary of the comparison: The selected explanation does not specify motivational effects through leadership.
New Zealand Ministry of Education · Whanaungatanga and manaakitanga: educational explanation (opens in a new tab) [10]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [10]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with behaviour that protects health or prevents harm to people and the planet.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [10]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [10]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with awareness of one’s own standpoint and curiosity about another person’s.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [10]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with responsibility to a global community and awareness of interrelationships.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [10]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Collective responsibility
Why this connects: Recognising obligations beyond oneself offers a route beyond self-importance.
Boundary of the comparison: Self-understanding and the full PVL definition are not articulated.
New Zealand Ministry of Education · Whanaungatanga and manaakitanga: educational explanation (opens in a new tab) [10]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Care for others
Why this connects: Concern for wellbeing creates a setting for understanding experience.
Boundary of the comparison: Care alone does not establish entering the other person’s frame of reference.
New Zealand Ministry of Education · Whanaungatanga and manaakitanga: educational explanation (opens in a new tab) [10]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Care, respect and hospitality are central concerns.
Why this connects: These connect with kindness in relationships.
Boundary of the comparison: The full PVL social-intelligence definition is not equivalent to manaakitanga.
New Zealand Ministry of Education · Manaakitanga (opens in a new tab) [10]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Generosity and welcome
Why this connects: Making room for people offers a related concern with opportunity.
Boundary of the comparison: Proportional attention and resources for all persons are not fully specified.
New Zealand Ministry of Education · Whanaungatanga and manaakitanga: educational explanation (opens in a new tab) [10]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with active attention to oneself, other people or the environment for protection and improvement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [10]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with curiosity and diversity of thought when seeking clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [10]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Relationships involve reciprocal engagement and care.
Why this connects: Reciprocity provides a useful setting for considering two-way dialogue.
Boundary of the comparison: The selected page does not define feedback or participative decision-making as PVL does.
New Zealand Ministry of Education · Reciprocal relationships (opens in a new tab) [10]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [10]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with helping another person develop skills, attributes or performance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [10]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Welcoming and caring for others create conditions for engagement.
Why this connects: Making people welcome can help them engage in dialogue.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL specifically requires personal availability through appropriate times, places and methods.
New Zealand Ministry of Education · Manaakitanga (opens in a new tab) [10]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Relationships and reciprocal responsibilities are foregrounded.
Why this connects: Cultivating relationships is central to developing connections.
Boundary of the comparison: Kinship and reciprocal belonging cannot be reduced to professional networking.
New Zealand Ministry of Education · Whanaungatanga (opens in a new tab) [10]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Reciprocity and collective responsibility inform relationships.
Why this connects: These support constructive work with others towards shared wellbeing.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL’s cross-boundary organisational formulation remains distinct.
New Zealand Ministry of Education · Whanaungatanga and manaakitanga (opens in a new tab) [10]
International educational framework · PISA, 2018 · Educational framework
Selection reviewed: The cited framework and its specified intercultural dimensions; not proof of PVL validity. [16] [21]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Evaluation connects evidence, arguments and alternative actions.
Why this connects: These closely connect with considered decisions based on sound analysis.
Boundary of the comparison: The OECD framework has its own educational and assessment purposes.
OECD · pp. 24–25: cognitive processes (opens in a new tab) [21]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Managing emotions in conflict
Why this connects: Regulation of emotions and stress is a central self-command behaviour.
Boundary of the comparison: The framework concerns global and intercultural situations.
OECD · Four dimensions; skills, attitudes and values; example inquiry scenarios (opens in a new tab) [21]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with consistent principled action for the right reasons despite circumstances.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [16] [21]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with truthful, trustworthy and straightforward conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [16] [21]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with sustained effort despite obstacles or discouragement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [16] [21]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with ethical leadership relationships, truthful self-understanding and openness to followers.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [16] [21]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with motivation created through a leader’s conduct and example.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [16] [21]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [16] [21]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Collective wellbeing and sustainability
Why this connects: Responsible action for wellbeing and sustainability connects with harm prevention.
Boundary of the comparison: The framework is not a clinical or cleanliness standard.
OECD · Four dimensions; skills, attitudes and values; example inquiry scenarios (opens in a new tab) [21]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Openness includes engaging with other perspectives and suspending assumptions.
Why this connects: This supports a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL’s definitions remain fixed while a learner examines assumptions.
Close alignment
Source evidence: One’s own perspective is considered alongside other cultural perspectives.
Why this connects: This closely connects with awareness of self and curiosity about another person.
Boundary of the comparison: Neither framework treats nationality as a complete description of a person.
Close alignment
Source evidence: Global mindedness includes obligations towards people and planet across national boundaries.
Why this connects: This strongly connects with global community and responsibility to its members.
Boundary of the comparison: The frameworks use their own terminology and structure.
OECD · pp. 16–17: global mindedness (opens in a new tab) [21]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Recognising one’s assumptions
Why this connects: Recognising the limits of one’s perspective supports self-awareness and openness.
Boundary of the comparison: The entire PVL absence-of-self-importance dimension is not fully specified.
OECD · Four dimensions; skills, attitudes and values; example inquiry scenarios (opens in a new tab) [21]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Perspective-taking concerns understanding another person’s position and viewpoint.
Why this connects: Understanding within another frame of reference is central to PVL Empathy.
Boundary of the comparison: Perspective-taking and empathy can be distinguished in particular research models.
OECD · pp. 14–15: perspective-taking (opens in a new tab) [21]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Dignity and regard for others
Why this connects: Regard for others’ dignity and feelings supports kindness and social awareness.
Boundary of the comparison: The two frameworks organise these concerns differently.
OECD · Four dimensions; skills, attitudes and values; example inquiry scenarios (opens in a new tab) [21]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Attention to needs and power differences
Why this connects: Considering different positions and needs connects with proportional attention.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete allocation of resources and opportunities is not defined.
OECD · Four dimensions; skills, attitudes and values; example inquiry scenarios (opens in a new tab) [21]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Listening and noticing reactions
Why this connects: Attending to others’ responses connects with purposeful social observation.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL additionally extends observation across environments and contexts.
OECD · Four dimensions; skills, attitudes and values; example inquiry scenarios (opens in a new tab) [21]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Questions to clarify perspectives
Why this connects: Seeking relevant information and asking about actors’ perspectives is a central inquiry behaviour.
Boundary of the comparison: The examples are illustrative rather than independently validated PVL assessment tasks.
OECD · Four dimensions; skills, attitudes and values; example inquiry scenarios (opens in a new tab) [21]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Interaction requires listening, explanation and negotiation of meaning.
Why this connects: These support engaged dialogue and reciprocal understanding.
Boundary of the comparison: The full PVL requirement for participative decision-making is not assessed here.
OECD · pp. 10–11 and 14–15: intercultural interaction (opens in a new tab) [21]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Evidence is examined for bias, gaps and conflicting arguments.
Why this connects: This directly connects with scrutiny of the factual basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This comparison does not transfer PISA validation to PVL.
OECD · pp. 24–25: evaluate information (opens in a new tab) [21]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Learning opportunities and teaching practice
Why this connects: Helping learners develop intercultural understanding connects with developing skills.
Boundary of the comparison: An education framework is not identical to every individual coaching relationship.
OECD · Four dimensions; skills, attitudes and values; example inquiry scenarios (opens in a new tab) [21]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Methods for intercultural exchange
Why this connects: Adapting communication provides a context for making dialogue possible.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete personal availability definition is not specified.
OECD · Four dimensions; skills, attitudes and values; example inquiry scenarios (opens in a new tab) [21]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Engagement extends across cultural boundaries.
Why this connects: Cross-cultural engagement can support relationships beyond an immediate community.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL also requires developing networks at operational, personal and strategic levels.
OECD · pp. 10–11: intercultural interaction (opens in a new tab) [21]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Responsible action addresses shared wellbeing and sustainability.
Why this connects: Joint constructive action supports positive outcomes with others.
Boundary of the comparison: The exact PVL relationship-building definition is wider than this selected connection.
OECD · pp. 11–12: action for collective wellbeing (opens in a new tab) [21]
East Africa · Ethiopia · Jimma University scholarly account · Scholarly account of a tradition
Selection reviewed: The abstract and stated findings of Fekede and colleagues’ 2024 review. It addresses peace, justice and relations with people and nature; it is not a comprehensive account of every Oromo community. [29]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with considered decisions informed by analysis and available facts.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [29]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with regulation of emotions, thoughts and positive conduct under pressure.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [29]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Core guiding principles
Why this connects: Maintaining guiding principles offers a connection with consistency.
Boundary of the comparison: The abstract does not define principled leadership action in PVL’s terms.
Alemayehu Fekede and colleagues, Jimma University · Article abstract and stated findings, pp. 136–152 (opens in a new tab) [29]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with truthful, trustworthy and straightforward conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [29]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with sustained effort despite obstacles or discouragement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [29]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with ethical leadership relationships, truthful self-understanding and openness to followers.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [29]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with motivation created through a leader’s conduct and example.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [29]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [29]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Peace with people and nature
Why this connects: Protecting relationships with humans and other creatures connects with preventing harm.
Boundary of the comparison: The selected abstract does not specify health or cleanliness practices.
Alemayehu Fekede and colleagues, Jimma University · Article abstract and stated findings, pp. 136–152 (opens in a new tab) [29]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [29]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: A situated account of peace
Why this connects: Examining how peace is understood offers material for reflecting on cultural standpoint.
Boundary of the comparison: Individual curiosity about another’s beliefs is not directly described.
Alemayehu Fekede and colleagues, Jimma University · Article abstract and stated findings, pp. 136–152 (opens in a new tab) [29]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Interdependent peace
Why this connects: Interdependence offers a related concern with consequences beyond oneself.
Boundary of the comparison: The passage does not explicitly address a global community or nations.
Alemayehu Fekede and colleagues, Jimma University · Article abstract and stated findings, pp. 136–152 (opens in a new tab) [29]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with self-understanding, openness, perspective-taking and absence of self-importance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [29]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with understanding experience within another person’s frame of reference.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [29]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Peace in human relationships
Why this connects: Maintaining peaceful relationships connects with rejection of cruelty.
Boundary of the comparison: Self-awareness and kindness are not fully defined in the selected abstract.
Alemayehu Fekede and colleagues, Jimma University · Article abstract and stated findings, pp. 136–152 (opens in a new tab) [29]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Justice and peace
Why this connects: Concern with justice offers a related route to examining fair treatment.
Boundary of the comparison: Proportional attention, resources and opportunity are not specified.
Alemayehu Fekede and colleagues, Jimma University · Article abstract and stated findings, pp. 136–152 (opens in a new tab) [29]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with active attention to oneself, other people or the environment for protection and improvement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [29]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with curiosity and diversity of thought when seeking clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [29]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with dialogue, shared feedback and participation in decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [29]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [29]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with helping another person develop skills, attributes or performance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [29]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with availability through appropriate times, places and means for two-way engagement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [29]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Relations with fellow humans
Why this connects: The account’s relational concern is relevant to connections among people.
Boundary of the comparison: It does not prescribe developing networks across boundaries.
Alemayehu Fekede and colleagues, Jimma University · Article abstract and stated findings, pp. 136–152 (opens in a new tab) [29]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Maintaining social peace
Why this connects: Sustaining peaceful relationships can create conditions for cooperative action.
Boundary of the comparison: A specific practice of joint work is not described in the abstract.
Alemayehu Fekede and colleagues, Jimma University · Article abstract and stated findings, pp. 136–152 (opens in a new tab) [29]
Pacific / Oceania · Ministry for Pacific Peoples, Aotearoa New Zealand · Contemporary engagement framework
Selection reviewed: The four Yavu principles and accompanying web guidance. This contemporary engagement framework recognises Pacific diversity and does not represent every Pacific culture. [31]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Context and affected voices
Why this connects: Considering circumstances and affected people contributes to a considered decision.
Boundary of the comparison: This is not a complete procedure for validating facts.
New Zealand Ministry for Pacific Peoples · Four principles; Why do we need Yavu?; engagement guidance (opens in a new tab) [31]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with regulation of emotions, thoughts and positive conduct under pressure.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [31]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with consistent principled action for the right reasons despite circumstances.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [31]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with truthful, trustworthy and straightforward conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [31]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with sustained effort despite obstacles or discouragement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [31]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Authentic engagement
Why this connects: Relationships informed by people’s values and voices connect with ethical openness.
Boundary of the comparison: The full leadership legitimacy and truthful self-concept definition is not supplied.
New Zealand Ministry for Pacific Peoples · Four principles; Why do we need Yavu?; engagement guidance (opens in a new tab) [31]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Recognition of contributions
Why this connects: Recognising people’s contribution may encourage further participation.
Boundary of the comparison: The source does not define motivation through a leader’s example.
New Zealand Ministry for Pacific Peoples · Four principles; Why do we need Yavu?; engagement guidance (opens in a new tab) [31]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [31]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with behaviour that protects health or prevents harm to people and the planet.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [31]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Hearing community voices
Why this connects: Allowing community perspectives into each stage supports a serious hearing.
Boundary of the comparison: Intellectual opposition is not separately addressed.
New Zealand Ministry for Pacific Peoples · Four principles; Why do we need Yavu?; engagement guidance (opens in a new tab) [31]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Understanding context
Why this connects: Learning who people are and how values shape engagement is a central connection.
Boundary of the comparison: The framework’s community setting remains distinct from every individual encounter.
New Zealand Ministry for Pacific Peoples · Four principles; Why do we need Yavu?; engagement guidance (opens in a new tab) [31]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Pacific relationships in migration
Why this connects: Relationships shaped by migration offer a context for thinking across countries.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete global-community definition is not explicitly taught.
New Zealand Ministry for Pacific Peoples · Four principles; Why do we need Yavu?; engagement guidance (opens in a new tab) [31]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Recognising others’ contribution
Why this connects: Making room for others’ knowledge challenges a solely self-centred account.
Boundary of the comparison: The full PVL definition also concerns self-understanding.
New Zealand Ministry for Pacific Peoples · Four principles; Why do we need Yavu?; engagement guidance (opens in a new tab) [31]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Values, needs and aspirations
Why this connects: Understanding people’s own perspectives connects with entering their frame of reference.
Boundary of the comparison: The source does not define every emotional dimension of Empathy.
New Zealand Ministry for Pacific Peoples · Four principles; Why do we need Yavu?; engagement guidance (opens in a new tab) [31]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Meaningful, respectful engagement
Why this connects: Engaging with people through their values supports social awareness and care.
Boundary of the comparison: The rejection of cruelty is not separately developed here.
New Zealand Ministry for Pacific Peoples · Four principles; Why do we need Yavu?; engagement guidance (opens in a new tab) [31]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Voices throughout engagement
Why this connects: Including affected people connects with fair opportunity to participate.
Boundary of the comparison: It does not establish proportional material provision in every setting.
New Zealand Ministry for Pacific Peoples · Four principles; Why do we need Yavu?; engagement guidance (opens in a new tab) [31]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Attention to context
Why this connects: Learning the circumstances of an encounter offers a role for observation.
Boundary of the comparison: A distinct active observation method is not supplied.
New Zealand Ministry for Pacific Peoples · Four principles; Why do we need Yavu?; engagement guidance (opens in a new tab) [31]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Consultation and community voices
Why this connects: Seeking people’s perspectives opens a route to clarification and different ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: The webpage does not prescribe a particular questioning method.
New Zealand Ministry for Pacific Peoples · Four principles; Why do we need Yavu?; engagement guidance (opens in a new tab) [31]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Reciprocal engagement
Why this connects: Two-way engagement throughout a process connects closely with participative communication.
Boundary of the comparison: Its practical protocols retain their own Pacific contexts.
New Zealand Ministry for Pacific Peoples · Four principles; Why do we need Yavu?; engagement guidance (opens in a new tab) [31]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [31]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Practice guidance and learning
Why this connects: Guidance on better engagement offers a setting for developing capability.
Boundary of the comparison: The page is not itself a definition of helping an individual reach optimal performance.
New Zealand Ministry for Pacific Peoples · Four principles; Why do we need Yavu?; engagement guidance (opens in a new tab) [31]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Making time to connect
Why this connects: Time and an appropriate engagement environment are central availability behaviours.
Boundary of the comparison: Appropriate methods still depend on the actual people involved.
New Zealand Ministry for Pacific Peoples · Four principles; Why do we need Yavu?; engagement guidance (opens in a new tab) [31]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Nurturing relationships
Why this connects: Deliberately building and strengthening relationships closely connects with Connected.
Boundary of the comparison: The source does not require every form of strategic networking.
New Zealand Ministry for Pacific Peoples · Four principles; Why do we need Yavu?; engagement guidance (opens in a new tab) [31]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Sustained reciprocal relationships
Why this connects: Investment beyond a one-off transaction connects with constructive shared work.
Boundary of the comparison: The comparison does not assume that engagement guarantees positive outcomes.
New Zealand Ministry for Pacific Peoples · Four principles; Why do we need Yavu?; engagement guidance (opens in a new tab) [31]
South Asia and worldwide · SGPC Main Principles · Faith community account
Selection reviewed: The SGPC’s account of principles, service and education within Sikhism. [8]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with considered decisions informed by analysis and available facts.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [8]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Control of thought, speech and conduct
Why this connects: Self-command in response to emotions is a central connection.
Boundary of the comparison: Its religious basis is not a PVL requirement.
Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee · Main Principles: self-command, practice, humility, education and service (opens in a new tab) [8]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Practice beyond words
Why this connects: Cultivating virtue through actual conduct supports consistent principled action.
Boundary of the comparison: The source’s theological claims are not adopted by PVL.
Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee · Main Principles: self-command, practice, humility, education and service (opens in a new tab) [8]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Honest work and livelihood are commended.
Why this connects: Truthfulness in everyday conduct is central to PVL Honesty.
Boundary of the comparison: The full religious account and PVL’s longer definition remain distinct.
Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee · Honest livelihood (opens in a new tab) [8]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Practice and discipline
Why this connects: Continuing disciplined practice offers a setting for persistence.
Boundary of the comparison: Persistence despite discouragement is not separately defined.
Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee · Main Principles: self-command, practice, humility, education and service (opens in a new tab) [8]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Truth in heart and conduct
Why this connects: Truthful conduct consistent with inner commitments supports ethical credibility.
Boundary of the comparison: Followers’ input and modern leadership legitimacy are not fully specified.
Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee · Main Principles: self-command, practice, humility, education and service (opens in a new tab) [8]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Learning and service are directed towards constructive living.
Why this connects: Purposeful example may encourage others to develop and contribute.
Boundary of the comparison: A direct account of motivation through a leader’s behaviour is not specified.
Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee · Education and service (opens in a new tab) [8]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [8]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with behaviour that protects health or prevents harm to people and the planet.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [8]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [8]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with awareness of one’s own standpoint and curiosity about another person’s.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [8]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Service to all humanity
Why this connects: Concern beyond social labels connects with responsibility to a wider human community.
Boundary of the comparison: Complex relationships among nations are not fully described.
Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee · Main Principles: self-command, practice, humility, education and service (opens in a new tab) [8]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Restraint of ego
Why this connects: Rejecting inflated self-importance is a central connection.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL also specifies self-understanding and perspective-taking.
Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee · Main Principles: self-command, practice, humility, education and service (opens in a new tab) [8]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with understanding experience within another person’s frame of reference.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [8]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Service and regard for humanity are foregrounded.
Why this connects: Service for others offers a connection with kindness.
Boundary of the comparison: The whole social-intelligence definition is not established by this selected account.
Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee · Service and human dignity (opens in a new tab) [8]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Need-sensitive sharing and inclusion
Why this connects: Sharing according to need and opening participation connect with proportional support.
Boundary of the comparison: The account is not a complete distribution method for all resources or opportunities.
Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee · Education, sharing with those in need, and participation (opens in a new tab) [8]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Attention to inner conduct
Why this connects: Self-command offers a context for noticing one’s responses.
Boundary of the comparison: The source does not define a general observation method across all settings.
Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee · Main Principles: self-command, practice, humility, education and service (opens in a new tab) [8]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with curiosity and diversity of thought when seeking clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [8]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Kind words and collective counsel
Why this connects: Considerate speech and collective counsel support dialogue.
Boundary of the comparison: This religious practice is not a complete PVL communication definition.
Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee · Main Principles: self-command, practice, humility, education and service (opens in a new tab) [8]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [8]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Training another person
Why this connects: Purposeful training connects with helping another develop.
Boundary of the comparison: The religious educational aim differs from optimal performance in every PVL context.
Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee · The concept of education: training and purposeful development (opens in a new tab) [8]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Participation in gatherings
Why this connects: Open participation creates a particular route to engagement.
Boundary of the comparison: Access to meetings is narrower than general personal availability.
Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee · Main Principles: self-command, practice, humility, education and service (opens in a new tab) [8]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Community association
Why this connects: Maintaining community associations connects with personal relationships.
Boundary of the comparison: The full organisational and international networking reach is not specified.
Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee · Main Principles: self-command, practice, humility, education and service (opens in a new tab) [8]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Service within society
Why this connects: Contributing through shared community life supports constructive joint outcomes.
Boundary of the comparison: The full investment across boundaries remains wider.
Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee · Main Principles: self-command, practice, humility, education and service (opens in a new tab) [8]
Asia · Ministry of Education, Nurturing Early Learners · Early-childhood framework
Selection reviewed: The Nurturing Early Learners Values overview and linked Care, Respect and Responsibility explanations. These are early-childhood education examples, not every Singaporean’s beliefs. [13] [53] [54] [55]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with considered decisions informed by analysis and available facts.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [13] [53] [54] [55]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Accepting consequences
Why this connects: Responding without deflecting responsibility offers a context for self-management.
Boundary of the comparison: Regulation of emotions and thoughts is not directly defined.
Singapore Ministry of Education · Responsibility: definition and examples (opens in a new tab) [55]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Honesty and responsibility guide conduct.
Why this connects: Responsible, truthful conduct is relevant to consistency between commitments and actions.
Boundary of the comparison: This connection does not establish all dimensions of PVL Integrity.
Singapore Ministry of Education · Honesty and responsibility (opens in a new tab) [13]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Honesty is an explicitly named value.
Why this connects: Its concern with truthfulness connects with the core of PVL Honesty.
Boundary of the comparison: A shared term does not make the two frameworks’ full definitions identical.
Singapore Ministry of Education · Honesty (opens in a new tab) [13]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with sustained effort despite obstacles or discouragement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [13] [53] [54] [55]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with ethical leadership relationships, truthful self-understanding and openness to followers.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [13] [53] [54] [55]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Encouraging a friend
Why this connects: Encouragement offers a setting for positive motivation.
Boundary of the comparison: The example does not explicitly concern a leader’s conduct.
Singapore Ministry of Education · Care: definition, importance and examples (opens in a new tab) [53]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [13] [53] [54] [55]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Care for a shared setting
Why this connects: Responsible tidying offers a practical context for cleanliness.
Boundary of the comparison: The selected examples are not a health or infection-prevention standard.
Singapore Ministry of Education · Responsibility: definition and examples (opens in a new tab) [55]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Willingness to hear others’ ideas
Why this connects: Listening to another’s ideas supports a fair hearing.
Boundary of the comparison: Intellectual opposition and revising commitments are not fully specified.
Singapore Ministry of Education · Respect: definition and examples (opens in a new tab) [54]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Appreciating cultural diversity
Why this connects: Recognising different backgrounds connects with curiosity and understanding.
Boundary of the comparison: Full personal cultural self-awareness is not defined.
Singapore Ministry of Education · Respect: definition and examples (opens in a new tab) [54]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with responsibility to a global community and awareness of interrelationships.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [13] [53] [54] [55]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Appreciating others’ help
Why this connects: Acknowledging others’ contributions offers a route away from self-importance.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete multidimensional definition is not supplied.
Singapore Ministry of Education · Respect: definition and examples (opens in a new tab) [54]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Understanding feelings and needs
Why this connects: Attending to another’s feelings and needs is a central connection.
Boundary of the comparison: The child-friendly account differs from the complete PVL definition.
Singapore Ministry of Education · Care: definition, importance and examples (opens in a new tab) [53]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Care and respect are explicitly named values.
Why this connects: These support the kindness dimension of Humanity.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete self- and social-awareness definition is not assessed here.
Singapore Ministry of Education · Care and respect (opens in a new tab) [13]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Help matched to difficulty
Why this connects: Helping someone facing a particular difficulty connects with proportional support.
Boundary of the comparison: Every resource or opportunity is not specified.
Singapore Ministry of Education · Care: definition, importance and examples (opens in a new tab) [53]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Noticing another’s difficulty
Why this connects: Attention to feelings and needs supports observation for improvement.
Boundary of the comparison: The full range of environments and contexts is not described.
Singapore Ministry of Education · Care: definition, importance and examples (opens in a new tab) [53]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with curiosity and diversity of thought when seeking clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [13] [53] [54] [55]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Attentive listening
Why this connects: Considerate listening and speaking support engaged dialogue.
Boundary of the comparison: Feedback and participative decisions are not fully specified.
Singapore Ministry of Education · Respect: definition and examples (opens in a new tab) [54]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [13] [53] [54] [55]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Support during a difficult task
Why this connects: Helping someone through difficulty offers a setting for development.
Boundary of the comparison: Encouragement alone does not establish specific skill-building.
Singapore Ministry of Education · Care: definition, importance and examples (opens in a new tab) [53]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Being ready to help
Why this connects: Responding to someone in difficulty is related to approachability.
Boundary of the comparison: Times, places and means for dialogue are not specified.
Singapore Ministry of Education · Care: definition, importance and examples (opens in a new tab) [53]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with developing relationships across personal, organisational or wider boundaries.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [13] [53] [54] [55]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Dependable contribution
Why this connects: Contributing responsibly to a group supports constructive shared outcomes.
Boundary of the comparison: Cross-boundary relationship-building is outside this short account.
Singapore Ministry of Education · Responsibility: definition and examples (opens in a new tab) [55]
Mediterranean origins and worldwide · Enchiridion · Ethical philosophy
Selection reviewed: Selected sections of Epictetus in Elizabeth Carter’s translation. Self-command and examination of impressions are compared without adopting every ancient social assumption. [44]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Examining impressions
Why this connects: Testing an impression before responding connects with considered judgement.
Boundary of the comparison: Stoic assent is not identical to PVL’s standard of validated facts.
Epictetus · Enchiridion §§1, 5, 10, 20, 24, 33, 42–46 and 49–52 (opens in a new tab) [44]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Command of reactions
Why this connects: Managing one’s response to difficulty is a central behavioural connection.
Boundary of the comparison: The source’s treatment of loss and external circumstances remains philosophically distinct.
Epictetus · Enchiridion §§1, 5, 10, 20, 24, 33, 42–46 and 49–52 (opens in a new tab) [44]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Principle in practice
Why this connects: Living a principle rather than merely discussing it closely connects with consistent action.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL retains its own definition of positive purposes and outcomes.
Epictetus · Enchiridion §§1, 5, 10, 20, 24, 33, 42–46 and 49–52 (opens in a new tab) [44]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Care over claims and speech
Why this connects: Avoiding unsupported assertions and careless speech supports trustworthy conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: The full PVL definition is not reproduced.
Epictetus · Enchiridion §§1, 5, 10, 20, 24, 33, 42–46 and 49–52 (opens in a new tab) [44]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Practice despite difficulty
Why this connects: Continuing principled practice in difficulty connects closely with persistence.
Boundary of the comparison: Persistence remains subject to all the other PVL Values.
Epictetus · Enchiridion §§1, 5, 10, 20, 24, 33, 42–46 and 49–52 (opens in a new tab) [44]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Demonstrating principles in life
Why this connects: A relationship between professed principles and conduct supports ethical credibility.
Boundary of the comparison: Followers’ input and modern leadership legitimacy are not fully defined.
Epictetus · Enchiridion §§1, 5, 10, 20, 24, 33, 42–46 and 49–52 (opens in a new tab) [44]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Example through conduct
Why this connects: Living one’s principles offers a possible example for others.
Boundary of the comparison: The text does not establish a positive motivational effect on followers.
Epictetus · Enchiridion §§1, 5, 10, 20, 24, 33, 42–46 and 49–52 (opens in a new tab) [44]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Restraint in joking
Why this connects: Care over humour that causes offence provides a constraint on appropriate levity.
Boundary of the comparison: The source does not promote humour for team creativity or motivation.
Epictetus · Enchiridion §§1, 5, 10, 20, 24, 33, 42–46 and 49–52 (opens in a new tab) [44]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with behaviour that protects health or prevents harm to people and the planet.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [44]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Examining another’s perspective
Why this connects: Considering why another sees matters differently supports a fair hearing.
Boundary of the comparison: Stoic convictions still shape this practice; exact conceptual identity is not assumed.
Epictetus · Enchiridion §§1, 5, 10, 20, 24, 33, 42–46 and 49–52 (opens in a new tab) [44]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with awareness of one’s own standpoint and curiosity about another person’s.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [44]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with responsibility to a global community and awareness of interrelationships.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [44]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Limits to claims of understanding
Why this connects: Avoiding displays of knowledge and recognising one’s limitations connect with humility.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete multidimensional PVL definition remains wider.
Epictetus · Enchiridion §§1, 5, 10, 20, 24, 33, 42–46 and 49–52 (opens in a new tab) [44]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Another person’s judgement
Why this connects: Considering the understanding behind another’s action offers a route towards perspective-taking.
Boundary of the comparison: This does not establish emotional understanding or agreement with their judgement.
Epictetus · Enchiridion §§1, 5, 10, 20, 24, 33, 42–46 and 49–52 (opens in a new tab) [44]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Considerate relations
Why this connects: Restraint in blaming and treatment of other people connects with kindness.
Boundary of the comparison: The source’s wider historical assumptions are not endorsed.
Epictetus · Enchiridion §§1, 5, 10, 20, 24, 33, 42–46 and 49–52 (opens in a new tab) [44]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with proportional attention, resources and opportunities for all persons.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [44]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Attention to one’s responses
Why this connects: Monitoring impressions and responses is a central self-observation behaviour.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL also explicitly extends observation to others and the environment.
Epictetus · Enchiridion §§1, 5, 10, 20, 24, 33, 42–46 and 49–52 (opens in a new tab) [44]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Examining what a claim concerns
Why this connects: Scrutinising an impression connects with seeking clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete encouragement of diverse thought is not specified.
Epictetus · Enchiridion §§1, 5, 10, 20, 24, 33, 42–46 and 49–52 (opens in a new tab) [44]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Careful listening and speech
Why this connects: Measured participation in conversation supports responsible dialogue.
Boundary of the comparison: Participative decision-making and feedback are not fully specified.
Epictetus · Enchiridion §§1, 5, 10, 20, 24, 33, 42–46 and 49–52 (opens in a new tab) [44]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Avoiding hasty conclusions
Why this connects: Distinguishing appearances from warranted judgement supports scrutiny.
Boundary of the comparison: The source’s epistemology is not a modern fact-validation protocol.
Epictetus · Enchiridion §§1, 5, 10, 20, 24, 33, 42–46 and 49–52 (opens in a new tab) [44]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Example and practical counsel
Why this connects: Practical counsel can help another person develop.
Boundary of the comparison: The selected text does not define a coaching relationship focused on optimal performance.
Epictetus · Enchiridion §§1, 5, 10, 20, 24, 33, 42–46 and 49–52 (opens in a new tab) [44]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with availability through appropriate times, places and means for two-way engagement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [44]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with developing relationships across personal, organisational or wider boundaries.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [44]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with investment in relationships across boundaries for positive shared outcomes.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [44]
Africa · South African Government account · Public account of a tradition
Selection reviewed: A particular public account of a Southern African tradition; not all African philosophies. [2]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with considered decisions informed by analysis and available facts.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [2]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with regulation of emotions, thoughts and positive conduct under pressure.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [2]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Refusing harmful dealings
Why this connects: Refusing stolen goods and responding to abuse connect with principled action.
Boundary of the comparison: These are practical illustrations rather than a complete integrity theory.
South African Government · Practical Ubuntu examples: support, opportunities and availability (opens in a new tab) [2]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Rejecting stolen goods
Why this connects: Avoiding participation in theft connects with trustworthy dealings.
Boundary of the comparison: Every form of truthfulness is not defined.
South African Government · Practical Ubuntu examples: support, opportunities and availability (opens in a new tab) [2]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Overcoming challenges together
Why this connects: Shared support in difficulty offers a context for persistence.
Boundary of the comparison: An individual persistence practice is not specified.
South African Government · Practical Ubuntu examples: support, opportunities and availability (opens in a new tab) [2]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with ethical leadership relationships, truthful self-understanding and openness to followers.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [2]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Supporting opportunities for others helps them realise their potential.
Why this connects: Enabling others offers a connection with positive motivation.
Boundary of the comparison: The full PVL definition specifies a leader’s behaviour and example.
South African Government · Enabling potential (opens in a new tab) [2]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [2]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Food security and protection
Why this connects: Practical support and resisting violence connect with prevention of harm.
Boundary of the comparison: The examples do not validate a specific medical intervention.
South African Government · Practical Ubuntu examples: support, opportunities and availability (opens in a new tab) [2]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [2]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Heritage and diversity
Why this connects: Recognising situated heritage offers a context for awareness of standpoint.
Boundary of the comparison: Curiosity about another individual’s beliefs is not fully specified.
South African Government · Practical Ubuntu examples: support, opportunities and availability (opens in a new tab) [2]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with responsibility to a global community and awareness of interrelationships.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [2]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Interdependence
Why this connects: Recognising the need for others challenges inflated self-sufficiency.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete self-understanding definition is wider.
South African Government · Practical Ubuntu examples: support, opportunities and availability (opens in a new tab) [2]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Empathy and compassion are explicit qualities in this account.
Why this connects: Understanding and concern for another’s experience connect closely with Empathy.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL’s frame-of-reference definition remains the precise baseline.
South African Government · Compassion and empathy (opens in a new tab) [2]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Human dignity and care for others are foregrounded.
Why this connects: These support kindness and resistance to cruelty.
Boundary of the comparison: The source is not being used as an exact definition of social intelligence.
South African Government · Human dignity and care (opens in a new tab) [2]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Support and first opportunities
Why this connects: Need-sensitive help and first work opportunities connect with proportional support.
Boundary of the comparison: Actual equity in all provision is not established.
South African Government · Practical Ubuntu examples: support, opportunities and availability (opens in a new tab) [2]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Attention to distress and harm
Why this connects: Noticing people needing support connects with observation for protection.
Boundary of the comparison: The examples are not a full observational method.
South African Government · Practical Ubuntu examples: support, opportunities and availability (opens in a new tab) [2]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with curiosity and diversity of thought when seeking clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [2]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Listening and guidance
Why this connects: Listening and support connect with two-way exchange.
Boundary of the comparison: Participative decision-making is not fully described.
South African Government · Practical Ubuntu examples: support, opportunities and availability (opens in a new tab) [2]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [2]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Guidance and support help others develop.
Why this connects: Helping another person improve is central to Coach.
Boundary of the comparison: The particular skills, traits and competencies still require attention in practice.
South African Government · Guidance and support (opens in a new tab) [2]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Being available to young people
Why this connects: Making oneself available for support is a central availability behaviour.
Boundary of the comparison: Appropriate methods and boundaries still require practical judgement.
South African Government · Practical Ubuntu examples: support, opportunities and availability (opens in a new tab) [2]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: People’s wellbeing is understood through their relationships with others.
Why this connects: Relational interdependence offers a connection with developing personal connections.
Boundary of the comparison: Community interdependence is not identical to operational or strategic networking.
South African Government · Interdependence (opens in a new tab) [2]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Mutual support and common interests inform community relationships.
Why this connects: These connect with investing in constructive relationships for shared outcomes.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL explicitly extends the commitment across organisational and wider boundaries.
South African Government · Mutual support (opens in a new tab) [2]
International · organisational responsibilities · International organisational framework
Selection reviewed: The introductory commitments and Ten Principles on human rights, labour, environment and anti-corruption. The framework does not assess every personal leadership behaviour. [45]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Precaution for environmental decisions
Why this connects: Considering risks offers a context for considered decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: The Ten Principles do not prescribe a complete fact-based decision process.
United Nations Global Compact · Introduction and Principles 1–10 (opens in a new tab) [45]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with regulation of emotions, thoughts and positive conduct under pressure.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [45]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Consistent responsibilities wherever operating
Why this connects: Applying responsibilities across locations and resisting corruption connects closely with consistency.
Boundary of the comparison: Compliance with the framework does not establish all dimensions of PVL Integrity.
United Nations Global Compact · Introduction and Principles 1–10 (opens in a new tab) [45]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Resistance to bribery and extortion
Why this connects: Avoiding corrupt conduct supports trustworthy and equitable dealings.
Boundary of the comparison: Truthful communication and every other part of Honesty are not separately defined.
United Nations Global Compact · Introduction and Principles 1–10 (opens in a new tab) [45]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with sustained effort despite obstacles or discouragement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [45]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Values in strategy and practice
Why this connects: Aligning commitments with operations offers a context for ethical credibility.
Boundary of the comparison: Truthful self-concepts and followers’ input are outside the selected principles.
United Nations Global Compact · Introduction and Principles 1–10 (opens in a new tab) [45]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with motivation created through a leader’s conduct and example.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [45]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [45]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Human and environmental harm prevention
Why this connects: Protection against abuses and environmental damage connects with preventing harm.
Boundary of the comparison: The principles are not a specific clinical or cleanliness standard.
United Nations Global Compact · Introduction and Principles 1–10 (opens in a new tab) [45]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [45]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with awareness of one’s own standpoint and curiosity about another person’s.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [45]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Responsibilities across locations
Why this connects: Maintaining responsibility for people and planet across borders is a central global connection.
Boundary of the comparison: The framework’s organisational scope differs from an individual PVL definition.
United Nations Global Compact · Introduction and Principles 1–10 (opens in a new tab) [45]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with self-understanding, openness, perspective-taking and absence of self-importance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [45]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with understanding experience within another person’s frame of reference.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [45]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Protection against abuse
Why this connects: Rejecting abusive treatment connects with resistance to cruelty.
Boundary of the comparison: Self- and social-awareness are not separately defined.
United Nations Global Compact · Introduction and Principles 1–10 (opens in a new tab) [45]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Eliminating employment discrimination
Why this connects: Fair access to work connects with opportunities for all persons.
Boundary of the comparison: Proportional provision of resources goes beyond non-discrimination alone.
United Nations Global Compact · Introduction and Principles 1–10 (opens in a new tab) [45]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with active attention to oneself, other people or the environment for protection and improvement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [45]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with curiosity and diversity of thought when seeking clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [45]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Collective representation
Why this connects: Recognising collective bargaining offers a particular form of participative dialogue.
Boundary of the comparison: It is not a complete account of feedback or leadership communication.
United Nations Global Compact · Introduction and Principles 1–10 (opens in a new tab) [45]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [45]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with helping another person develop skills, attributes or performance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [45]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with availability through appropriate times, places and means for two-way engagement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [45]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Shared international responsibilities
Why this connects: A common framework offers a context for relationships across countries.
Boundary of the comparison: The Ten Principles themselves do not prescribe personal networking.
United Nations Global Compact · Introduction and Principles 1–10 (opens in a new tab) [45]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Common responsibilities in practice
Why this connects: Shared responsibilities create a basis for constructive cooperation.
Boundary of the comparison: Specific investment in cross-boundary relationships is not fully stated in the Ten Principles.
United Nations Global Compact · Introduction and Principles 1–10 (opens in a new tab) [45]
International declaration · 2001 · International declaration
Selection reviewed: Selected articles and action-plan commitments in the Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity. [1]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with considered decisions informed by analysis and available facts.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [1]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with regulation of emotions, thoughts and positive conduct under pressure.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [1]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Consistent dignity commitments
Why this connects: Maintaining dignity when considering cultural claims offers a setting for principled consistency.
Boundary of the comparison: The declaration is not an individual Integrity definition.
UNESCO · Cultural Diversity Declaration, Articles 4–7 and Action Plan (opens in a new tab) [1]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with truthful, trustworthy and straightforward conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [1]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with sustained effort despite obstacles or discouragement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [1]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with ethical leadership relationships, truthful self-understanding and openness to followers.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [1]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with motivation created through a leader’s conduct and example.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [1]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [1]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Protection of human dignity
Why this connects: Respecting rights offers a related concern with avoiding harm.
Boundary of the comparison: A specific protective health or environmental behaviour is not defined here.
UNESCO · Cultural Diversity Declaration, Articles 4–7 and Action Plan (opens in a new tab) [1]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Dialogue and exchange across cultural difference are encouraged.
Why this connects: Dialogue can create space for a fair hearing of unfamiliar perspectives.
Boundary of the comparison: The declaration does not fully specify an individual’s handling of intellectual opposition.
UNESCO · Articles 1–2 and the action plan (opens in a new tab) [1]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Cultural plurality and understanding across groups are affirmed.
Why this connects: Understanding difference supports curiosity about another person’s beliefs and perceptions.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL additionally specifies awareness of one’s own personal standpoint.
UNESCO · Articles 1–2 and the action plan (opens in a new tab) [1]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Humanity’s shared cultural heritage creates responsibilities across communities.
Why this connects: A shared human concern connects with responsibility beyond immediate boundaries.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL’s full account of national interrelationships is not supplied by this selected connection.
UNESCO · Article 1 and international solidarity (opens in a new tab) [1]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Learning across cultures
Why this connects: Receiving knowledge beyond one’s own culture offers a context for recognising limits.
Boundary of the comparison: Absence of self-importance is not expressly defined.
UNESCO · Cultural Diversity Declaration, Articles 4–7 and Action Plan (opens in a new tab) [1]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Mutual understanding
Why this connects: Seeking understanding offers a context for entering others’ perspectives.
Boundary of the comparison: Intercultural understanding is not the complete psychological Empathy definition.
UNESCO · Cultural Diversity Declaration, Articles 4–7 and Action Plan (opens in a new tab) [1]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Respect for human dignity
Why this connects: Protecting dignity connects with resistance to degrading treatment.
Boundary of the comparison: Self- and social-awareness are not fully defined.
UNESCO · Cultural Diversity Declaration, Articles 4–7 and Action Plan (opens in a new tab) [1]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Participation and cultural rights are linked with inclusion and dignity.
Why this connects: These support opportunities for all persons to participate.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL’s proportional provision of resources is not fully defined here.
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with active attention to oneself, other people or the environment for protection and improvement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [1]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with curiosity and diversity of thought when seeking clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [1]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Exchange and genuine dialogue
Why this connects: Dialogue across cultures supports engaged communication.
Boundary of the comparison: Every feedback or decision practice is not defined.
UNESCO · Cultural Diversity Declaration, Articles 4–7 and Action Plan (opens in a new tab) [1]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [1]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Education and training
Why this connects: Developing understanding through education connects with helping others learn.
Boundary of the comparison: Individual performance and attributes remain wider concerns.
UNESCO · Cultural Diversity Declaration, Articles 4–7 and Action Plan (opens in a new tab) [1]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Access to expression
Why this connects: Making expression and participation possible supports access to engagement.
Boundary of the comparison: Institutional access differs from every leader’s personal availability.
UNESCO · Cultural Diversity Declaration, Articles 4–7 and Action Plan (opens in a new tab) [1]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Intercultural exchange is encouraged.
Why this connects: Exchange can build relationships across cultural and national boundaries.
Boundary of the comparison: The personal, operational and strategic dimensions of PVL networks are not all specified.
UNESCO · Action plan: dialogue and exchanges (opens in a new tab) [1]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Cooperation supports cultural exchange and inclusion.
Why this connects: This offers a connection with constructive relationships across boundaries.
Boundary of the comparison: The comparison concerns selected commitments rather than the whole PVL definition.
International psychological classification · VIA Institute · Contemporary psychological framework
Selection reviewed: The Institute’s short descriptions on page 1 of Character Strengths 360. Its 24 strengths are a separate classification from PVL’s 24 Values and do not validate the PVL architecture. [46]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Judgment and critical thinking
Why this connects: Examining matters from different sides and weighing evidence closely connects with considered judgement.
Boundary of the comparison: A shared label does not make the full definitions identical.
VIA Institute on Character · Character Strengths 360, page 1: named strength descriptions (opens in a new tab) [46]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Self-regulation
Why this connects: Managing impulses and emotions is a central self-regulation behaviour.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL also explicitly concerns positive conduct despite circumstances.
VIA Institute on Character · Character Strengths 360, page 1: named strength descriptions (opens in a new tab) [46]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Honesty and bravery
Why this connects: Principled truthfulness despite difficulty supports consistent moral conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: The full consistency of methods, measures and outcomes is not specified.
VIA Institute on Character · Character Strengths 360, page 1: named strength descriptions (opens in a new tab) [46]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Honesty and sincerity
Why this connects: Truthful, sincere conduct is a central behavioural connection.
Boundary of the comparison: VIA organises its strengths differently from PVL.
VIA Institute on Character · Character Strengths 360, page 1: named strength descriptions (opens in a new tab) [46]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Finishing despite obstacles
Why this connects: Continuing through obstacles is a central persistence behaviour.
Boundary of the comparison: The moral purpose of a task still requires the other PVL Values.
VIA Institute on Character · Character Strengths 360, page 1: named strength descriptions (opens in a new tab) [46]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Honesty and genuine presentation
Why this connects: Genuine presentation connects with truthful self-concepts.
Boundary of the comparison: Ethical relationships that value followers’ input are not fully defined by this strength alone.
VIA Institute on Character · Character Strengths 360, page 1: named strength descriptions (opens in a new tab) [46]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Leadership and encouragement
Why this connects: Supporting a group’s achievement connects with positive influence.
Boundary of the comparison: A leader’s motivating example is not identical to the whole VIA Leadership strength.
VIA Institute on Character · Character Strengths 360, page 1: named strength descriptions (opens in a new tab) [46]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Playfulness and bringing smiles
Why this connects: Appropriate levity and connection offer a central humour behaviour.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL additionally requires cultural judgement and constructive team or individual purposes.
VIA Institute on Character · Character Strengths 360, page 1: named strength descriptions (opens in a new tab) [46]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with behaviour that protects health or prevents harm to people and the planet.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [46]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Considering different sides
Why this connects: Weighing perspectives before settling on a view supports a fair hearing.
Boundary of the comparison: The framework remains a distinct classification.
VIA Institute on Character · Character Strengths 360, page 1: named strength descriptions (opens in a new tab) [46]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Social intelligence and curiosity
Why this connects: Attention to people’s feelings and experiences offers a route to exploring standpoint.
Boundary of the comparison: Cultural self-awareness and beliefs are not explicitly defined by these strengths.
VIA Institute on Character · Character Strengths 360, page 1: named strength descriptions (opens in a new tab) [46]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with responsibility to a global community and awareness of interrelationships.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [46]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Modesty without inflated importance
Why this connects: Keeping achievements in proportion connects with absence of self-importance.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL’s full definition adds other dimensions.
VIA Institute on Character · Character Strengths 360, page 1: named strength descriptions (opens in a new tab) [46]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Social intelligence
Why this connects: Sensitivity to others’ feelings connects with understanding experience.
Boundary of the comparison: It does not automatically establish entry into their own frame of reference.
VIA Institute on Character · Character Strengths 360, page 1: named strength descriptions (opens in a new tab) [46]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Social intelligence and kindness
Why this connects: Knowing feelings and acting kindly supports central Humanity behaviours.
Boundary of the comparison: The two frameworks combine these concerns differently.
VIA Institute on Character · Character Strengths 360, page 1: named strength descriptions (opens in a new tab) [46]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Fairness
Why this connects: Giving people a fair chance connects with opportunity for all.
Boundary of the comparison: Applying the same rules is not the same as providing proportionate resources.
VIA Institute on Character · Character Strengths 360, page 1: named strength descriptions (opens in a new tab) [46]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Social awareness
Why this connects: Attending to emotions and interpersonal situations connects with observing people.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL extends observation to environments and protection as well.
VIA Institute on Character · Character Strengths 360, page 1: named strength descriptions (opens in a new tab) [46]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Curiosity
Why this connects: An interest in exploring and asking questions connects with intellectual curiosity.
Boundary of the comparison: The full encouragement of diversity of thought is wider.
VIA Institute on Character · Character Strengths 360, page 1: named strength descriptions (opens in a new tab) [46]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Social intelligence and teamwork
Why this connects: Understanding social situations offers a context for effective dialogue.
Boundary of the comparison: Participative decision-making and feedback are not directly specified in these short descriptions.
VIA Institute on Character · Character Strengths 360, page 1: named strength descriptions (opens in a new tab) [46]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Critical consideration
Why this connects: Examining evidence rather than jumping to conclusions supports an evidenced view.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL’s qualified and validated facts standard is more specific.
VIA Institute on Character · Character Strengths 360, page 1: named strength descriptions (opens in a new tab) [46]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Perspective and good advice
Why this connects: Offering sound advice can support another person’s development.
Boundary of the comparison: Advice alone is not the full coaching process in PVL.
VIA Institute on Character · Character Strengths 360, page 1: named strength descriptions (opens in a new tab) [46]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with availability through appropriate times, places and means for two-way engagement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [46]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Love and teamwork
Why this connects: Maintaining close relations and group participation is related to personal connection.
Boundary of the comparison: Cross-boundary personal and strategic networks are not specifically described.
VIA Institute on Character · Character Strengths 360, page 1: named strength descriptions (opens in a new tab) [46]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Teamwork
Why this connects: Contributing responsibly to a group connects with constructive shared outcomes.
Boundary of the comparison: The PVL definition explicitly extends across organisational and community boundaries.
VIA Institute on Character · Character Strengths 360, page 1: named strength descriptions (opens in a new tab) [46]
International health framework · 2009 · Practical health framework
Selection reviewed: A deliberately narrow practical comparator in health care; not a comprehensive ethical framework. [18]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Recommendations grounded in review
Why this connects: Considering evidence before choosing protective practice supports considered decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: The topic is narrow and clinical rather than all leadership decisions.
World Health Organization · Publication overview: evidence review and recommendations (opens in a new tab) [18]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with regulation of emotions, thoughts and positive conduct under pressure.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [18]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with consistent principled action for the right reasons despite circumstances.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [18]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with truthful, trustworthy and straightforward conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [18]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with sustained effort despite obstacles or discouragement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [18]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with ethical leadership relationships, truthful self-understanding and openness to followers.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [18]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with motivation created through a leader’s conduct and example.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [18]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [18]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Hand-hygiene practice aims to reduce healthcare-associated infection.
Why this connects: This directly illustrates health behaviour that prevents harm to oneself and others.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL Hygiene extends beyond hand hygiene, clinical settings and infection prevention.
World Health Organization · Guidelines on hand hygiene in health care (opens in a new tab) [18]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [18]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with awareness of one’s own standpoint and curiosity about another person’s.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [18]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Application across care settings
Why this connects: An international reference offers a context for shared responsibility across settings.
Boundary of the comparison: The overview does not define an individual’s global mindset.
World Health Organization · Publication overview: evidence review and recommendations (opens in a new tab) [18]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with self-understanding, openness, perspective-taking and absence of self-importance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [18]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with understanding experience within another person’s frame of reference.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [18]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with self- and social-awareness, kindness and rejection of cruelty.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [18]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with proportional attention, resources and opportunities for all persons.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [18]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with active attention to oneself, other people or the environment for protection and improvement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [18]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with curiosity and diversity of thought when seeking clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [18]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with dialogue, shared feedback and participation in decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [18]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Review of evidence
Why this connects: A review used to inform practice is a central evidenced-view behaviour.
Boundary of the comparison: The comparison concerns the 2009 publication and does not provide current clinical advice.
World Health Organization · Publication overview: evidence review and recommendations (opens in a new tab) [18]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Guidance for improving practice
Why this connects: Recommendations offer a setting for helping practitioners improve.
Boundary of the comparison: A guideline is not itself a personal coaching relationship.
World Health Organization · Publication overview: evidence review and recommendations (opens in a new tab) [18]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with availability through appropriate times, places and means for two-way engagement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [18]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with developing relationships across personal, organisational or wider boundaries.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [18]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with investment in relationships across boundaries for positive shared outcomes.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [18]
Australia · Michael McDaniel’s account, AIATSIS · Community teaching
Selection reviewed: A named Wiradjuri concept explained by Michael McDaniel. It does not represent all Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander traditions. [26]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Care over impact
Why this connects: Considering consequences offers a setting for considered decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: The account does not specify factual validation or a full decision method.
Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies · Code of Ethics: Michael McDaniel’s explanation of yindyamarra (opens in a new tab) [26]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Gentle, responsible action
Why this connects: Deliberate, gentle conduct connects with managing one’s reactions.
Boundary of the comparison: Regulation of thoughts and emotions is not separately described.
Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies · Code of Ethics: Michael McDaniel’s explanation of yindyamarra (opens in a new tab) [26]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Honour and responsibility
Why this connects: Honourable action connects with principled conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: Consistency across methods and outcomes is not fully articulated.
Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies · Code of Ethics: Michael McDaniel’s explanation of yindyamarra (opens in a new tab) [26]
Close alignment
Source evidence: Honest dealings
Why this connects: Honesty towards other people is a central behavioural connection.
Boundary of the comparison: PVL’s longer definition includes additional attributes.
Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies · Code of Ethics: Michael McDaniel’s explanation of yindyamarra (opens in a new tab) [26]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with sustained effort despite obstacles or discouragement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [26]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with ethical leadership relationships, truthful self-understanding and openness to followers.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [26]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with motivation created through a leader’s conduct and example.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [26]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [26]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Attention to harmful impact
Why this connects: Care over what actions put into the world connects with preventing harm.
Boundary of the comparison: A health or disease-prevention practice is not specified.
Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies · Code of Ethics: Michael McDaniel’s explanation of yindyamarra (opens in a new tab) [26]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [26]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with awareness of one’s own standpoint and curiosity about another person’s.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [26]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with responsibility to a global community and awareness of interrelationships.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [26]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Acting slowly and respectfully
Why this connects: Pausing and showing respect can counter self-importance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is an interpretive connection; explicit self-understanding is not stated.
Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies · Code of Ethics: Michael McDaniel’s explanation of yindyamarra (opens in a new tab) [26]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with understanding experience within another person’s frame of reference.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [26]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Gentleness and respect
Why this connects: Gentle treatment supports kindness and resistance to cruelty.
Boundary of the comparison: The complete social-intelligence definition is wider.
Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies · Code of Ethics: Michael McDaniel’s explanation of yindyamarra (opens in a new tab) [26]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with proportional attention, resources and opportunities for all persons.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [26]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Attention to words and actions
Why this connects: Monitoring the effects of one’s conduct connects with observing oneself.
Boundary of the comparison: Attention across all settings and people is not fully specified.
Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies · Code of Ethics: Michael McDaniel’s explanation of yindyamarra (opens in a new tab) [26]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with curiosity and diversity of thought when seeking clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [26]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Care in speech
Why this connects: Considering how words affect others offers a constraint on dialogue.
Boundary of the comparison: Feedback and shared decisions are not expressly taught here.
Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies · Code of Ethics: Michael McDaniel’s explanation of yindyamarra (opens in a new tab) [26]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [26]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with helping another person develop skills, attributes or performance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [26]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with availability through appropriate times, places and means for two-way engagement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [26]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with developing relationships across personal, organisational or wider boundaries.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [26]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Responsible relations
Why this connects: Respectful conduct offers a foundation for constructive relationships.
Boundary of the comparison: Investment across boundaries and shared outcomes require an additional step.
Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies · Code of Ethics: Michael McDaniel’s explanation of yindyamarra (opens in a new tab) [26]
Iranian and Parsi traditions worldwide · FEZANA account · Faith community account
Selection reviewed: FEZANA’s short education account of Asha, thoughts, speech, deeds, charity and spiritual equality. The brevity of this source places deliberate limits on the comparisons. [38]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with considered decisions informed by analysis and available facts.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [38]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with regulation of emotions, thoughts and positive conduct under pressure.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [38]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Thought, speech and deeds
Why this connects: Considering thought, speech and action together offers a connection with principled consistency.
Boundary of the comparison: The short account does not fully articulate the PVL definition.
Federation of Zoroastrian Associations of North America · Religion education: short introductory account (opens in a new tab) [38]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with truthful, trustworthy and straightforward conduct.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [38]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with sustained effort despite obstacles or discouragement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [38]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Ethical thought and conduct
Why this connects: Ethical expression offers a context for truthful leadership relationships.
Boundary of the comparison: Truthful self-concepts, followers’ input and legitimacy are not specifically defined.
Federation of Zoroastrian Associations of North America · Religion education: short introductory account (opens in a new tab) [38]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Spreading happiness through charity
Why this connects: Visible beneficial conduct may encourage constructive action.
Boundary of the comparison: The source does not establish a leader’s motivational influence.
Federation of Zoroastrian Associations of North America · Religion education: short introductory account (opens in a new tab) [38]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with appropriate humour used to encourage people, strengthen teams or enable creativity.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [38]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with behaviour that protects health or prevents harm to people and the planet.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [38]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with a fair hearing for unfamiliar or opposing ideas.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [38]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with awareness of one’s own standpoint and curiosity about another person’s.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [38]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with responsibility to a global community and awareness of interrelationships.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [38]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with self-understanding, openness, perspective-taking and absence of self-importance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [38]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with understanding experience within another person’s frame of reference.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [38]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Charity and care
Why this connects: Charitable action connects with the kindness dimension.
Boundary of the comparison: The full social-intelligence definition is not provided.
Federation of Zoroastrian Associations of North America · Religion education: short introductory account (opens in a new tab) [38]
Partial alignment
Source evidence: Spiritual equality and duty
Why this connects: Equal regard across women and men supports fair opportunity.
Boundary of the comparison: Spiritual equality alone does not establish proportional resources for all persons.
Federation of Zoroastrian Associations of North America · Religion education: short introductory account (opens in a new tab) [38]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with active attention to oneself, other people or the environment for protection and improvement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [38]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with curiosity and diversity of thought when seeking clarification.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [38]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with dialogue, shared feedback and participation in decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [38]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with qualified, validated facts as the basis for decisions.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [38]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with helping another person develop skills, attributes or performance.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [38]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with availability through appropriate times, places and means for two-way engagement.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [38]
Reviewed: no clear connection
Review performed: The cited selection was checked against the fixed PVL definition.
Why no connection is recorded: The selected material does not provide a clear basis for linking this Value’s concern with developing relationships across personal, organisational or wider boundaries.
Boundary of the comparison: This is a completed review of the cited selection, not a finding that the whole tradition lacks or rejects the Value. Further passages may support a different conclusion.
Read the source scope for this row. Selected sources: [38]
Indirect connection
Source evidence: Beneficial action for others
Why this connects: Charity offers a setting for shared positive contribution.
Boundary of the comparison: The source does not describe investment in cross-boundary working relationships.
Federation of Zoroastrian Associations of North America · Religion education: short introductory account (opens in a new tab) [38]
Each Exemplar brings four Values together in an integrated Principle. The official wording and all 24 definitions are preserved below. Read each definition first, then consider the practical demands of exercising it where you are in life. The matrix holds the comparative evidence; the notes below focus on exercising the same defined Value in different circumstances.
No Values match that search. Try another term or clear the search to show all 24 Values.
Using power responsibly
IOWL Principle · official wordingOWLs will not use their position to influence, force or coerce any individual, entity or organisation into acts which are harmful to the same. OWLs will also challenge any individual who undertakes any such harmful acts.
| Positive Leadership Value | Exercising the same Value in context |
|---|---|
JudgementRead the IOWL definitionThe ability to make considered decisions based on sound analysis having been guided by the Positive Values of Observation, Questioning, Communication and available Information. Judgement is based upon the use of available facts, not on personal opinion, as opinion is absent of fact. |
Attentive consideration and critical evaluationTest assumptions with reliable evidence and relevant local knowledge. Neither seniority nor confidence establishes that a claim is true. |
StrengthRead the IOWL definitionThe ability to regulate your emotions, manage your thoughts, and behave in a positive manner, despite the circumstances. |
Self-regulation under pressureEmotional restraint may look different in different settings. Remaining composed should support constructive action when someone faces harm. |
IntegrityRead the IOWL definitionConsistency of actions, values, methods, measures, principles, expectations and outcomes. It connotes a deep commitment to do the right thing for the right reason, regardless of the circumstances. |
Principle beyond self-interestExamine whether conduct stays aligned when loyalty, status or advantage creates pressure to compromise it. |
HonestyRead the IOWL definitionHonesty is a facet of moral character that connotes positive and virtuous attributes such as integrity, truthfulness, straightforwardness, including straightforwardness of conduct, along with the absence of lying, cheating, theft, etc. Honesty also involves being trustworthy, loyal, equitable, fair and sincere. |
Truthfulness and trustChoose truthful, respectful language suited to the situation. Honesty can coexist with legitimate confidentiality; it does not license deception. |
Using influence to uplift
IOWL Principle · official wordingOWLs will be inclusive to all, exclusive to none and will uplift people with every interaction.
| Positive Leadership Value | Exercising the same Value in context |
|---|---|
PerseveranceRead the IOWL definitionSteady persistence, 'stickability' in a course of tasks or action in spite of difficulties, obstacles or discouragement. |
Sustained constructive effortSustain worthwhile effort while remaining willing to change course when evidence, consequences or other Positive Values require it. |
AuthenticityRead the IOWL definitionEmphasis on building legitimacy as a leader through honest relationships with followers which value their input, are built on an ethical foundation, with truthful self-concepts and promotion of openness. |
Sincerity in relationships and conductTruthful relationships can be expressed through modest, relational or collective styles. Authenticity need not mean unrestricted self-expression. |
InspirationRead the IOWL definitionCreation of enthusiasm, drive and motivation based on the leaders behaviours and example. |
Helping others see and develop possibilityInspiration may come through quiet example, mentoring or shared achievement. Consider whose confidence and agency your influence strengthens. |
HumourRead the IOWL definitionThe ability to use culturally and contextually appropriate humour, with a balance of gravity and levity, to encourage and motivate individuals, build stronger teams, cultures and unleash creativity. |
Levity governed by cultural judgementPVL’s own definition requires culturally and contextually appropriate humour. Consider language, status, sacred matters and the person receiving it. Using humour is never a reason to humiliate someone. |
Considering resources and wider consequences
IOWL Principle · official wordingOWLs will use resources; human, natural and capital, responsibly in an efficient manner, taking account of and mitigating the organisational, societal, and planetary consequences of their use.
| Positive Leadership Value | Exercising the same Value in context |
|---|---|
HygieneRead the IOWL definitionUndertakes behaviour conducive to maintaining health, cleanliness, prevention of harm or disease, to oneself, team, organisation, other people, society and planet. |
Preventing avoidable harmApply relevant evidence and support the conditions needed for healthy practice. PVL Hygiene is not a judgement about a culture’s ritual purity or the resources available to it. |
Open MindedRead the IOWL definitionIs receptive to new ideas, believes that others should be free to express their views and that the value of other peoples' knowledge should be recognised. Is able to move beyond or temporarily set aside personal doxastic commitments in order to give a fair and impartial hearing to intellectual opposition. |
A fair hearing across differenceListen seriously to unfamiliar perspectives, including criticism of your own assumptions. A fair hearing allows convictions to be examined without requiring uncritical agreement. |
Culturally AwareRead the IOWL definitionAn awareness of ones own personal values, beliefs and perceptions, matched with a curiosity and ability to understand the values, beliefs and perceptions of another person.. |
Recognising one’s own standpoint and others’Ask how the person understands their own context. Nationality, faith or ancestry cannot tell you everything about an individual’s values. |
Internationally MindedRead the IOWL definitionHolds a view of the world in which people are connected to the global community and assume a sense of responsibility to its members. It is an awareness of the inter-relatedness of all nations and peoples, and a recognition of the complexity of these relationships. |
Responsibility beyond immediate boundariesConnect local responsibilities with wider effects. International mindedness does not depend on travel, English fluency or abandoning local identity. |
Treating people with dignity
IOWL Principle · official wordingOWLs will treat people with dignity, respect, and be mindful of the emotional, mental and physical impact they have on the well-being of others.
| Positive Leadership Value | Exercising the same Value in context |
|---|---|
HumilityRead the IOWL definitionHumility is multi-dimensional and includes self-understanding, awareness, openness, perspective taking, and an absence of self-importance. |
Learning without inflated self-importanceAcknowledge what you do not know and make room for others’ insight. Humility can coexist with justified confidence and the courage to challenge harm. |
EmpathyRead the IOWL definitionThe capacity to understand or feel what another person is experiencing from within their frame of reference, that is, the capacity to place oneself in another's position. |
Understanding another person’s experienceAsk, listen and check your interpretation. Imagining how you would feel is only a starting point for understanding how another person actually feels. |
HumanityRead the IOWL definitionThe Social Intelligence to know oneself and know others subsuming self- and social-awareness. Displays genuine kindness and abhors cruelty. |
Kindness and resistance to crueltyConsider the lived impact on every person affected, especially those with little influence over the decision. |
EquitabilityRead the IOWL definitionProviding proportional attention, appreciation, resources, and opportunity to succeed, to all persons. |
Fair regard and proportionate opportunityAsk what support different people need to participate and succeed. Proportional attention can require different provision for different circumstances. |
Enabling informed understanding
IOWL Principle · official wordingOWLs will encourage and facilitate the exchange of information, not withholding or using information for inequitable advantage.
| Positive Leadership Value | Exercising the same Value in context |
|---|---|
ObservantRead the IOWL definitionMaintain alertness and actively pays attention in all contexts and situations. Observing oneself, other people, followers, the environment; in order to protect, develop and improve the same. |
Attention before interpretationNotice context and your own reactions. Interpret unfamiliar non-verbal signals cautiously and avoid turning observation into intrusive monitoring. |
QuestioningRead the IOWL definitionEncourages diversity of thought and intellectual curiosity when seeking clarification or understanding of an issue. |
Seeking clarification and understandingA respectful question may be asked privately, through a representative or in a group. Create a credible route for concerns where public challenge carries a social cost. |
CommunicativeRead the IOWL definitionEngages people in dialogue, actively shares and seeks feedback, practices participative decision-making, and is open and involved. |
Dialogue that respects its participantsAllow time for listening, translation and feedback. Direct speech, indirect speech, silence and mediation need to be understood in their actual context. |
Information AwareRead the IOWL definitionUnderstands the importance of an evidenced based view, seeking qualified and validated facts to inform decision making; ignoring speculation and opinion. |
Scrutiny of what informs a decisionVerify relevant claims and distinguish evidence, inference and uncertainty. Evaluate oral knowledge and local experience carefully rather than dismissing them because they are not written. |
Enabling contribution and development
IOWL Principle · official wordingOWLs will be forthright in engendering a collaborative approach in all working relationships, assisting others where they can, being virtuous and ethical.
| Positive Leadership Value | Exercising the same Value in context |
|---|---|
CoachRead the IOWL definitionRecognises the importance of helping others attain optimal performance and improvement; and of positively impacting an individual's personal attributes, such as social interaction or confidence, by helping them develop specific skills, traits and competencies. |
Helping another person developDevelopment may happen through elders, peers, apprenticeship or formal coaching. Adapt the relationship to the learner while keeping their growth central. |
AccessibleRead the IOWL definitionEnsures personal availability; using appropriate times, places, methods, technology to allow followers to engage in dialogue or two way communication. |
Making engagement genuinely possibleProvide suitable ways to engage across language, disability, time, technology and hierarchy. Availability needs workable boundaries and dependable routes of contact. |
ConnectedRead the IOWL definitionDevelops personal networks at an operational, personal, strategic level; across boundaries of organisations, communities, societies, countries, cultures and nations. |
Relationships across boundariesValue community relationships as well as professional networks. Build connections that allow knowledge and opportunity to travel beyond an established inner circle. |
CollaborativeRead the IOWL definitionInvests time to build relationships, across internal or external organisational boundaries; contexts; communities; in the pursuit of positive outcomes for all. |
Working together for positive outcomesWork towards shared outcomes while protecting honest disagreement. Agreement within a group does not make a harmful action positive. |
These hypothetical situations show why a Value may be more challenging at one point in life, or within one setting, than another. Each response must still meet the same definition. They are examples for reflection, not accounts of how all members of a culture behave.
A person may be asked to protect a colleague, employer or relative by overlooking harmful conduct. Integrity remains the same defined commitment. Reflection examines the conflicting loyalties, the consequences and the action needed to maintain that commitment.
Integrity · Judgement · Strength · Humanity
A learner may find it straightforward to be truthful in everyday conversation and difficult when a mistake threatens their position. Timing and the route of communication require judgement; the definition of Honesty and the expectation of truthful conduct remain consistent.
Honesty · Strength · Empathy · Communicative
A manager may feel pressure to favour an established group. The definition still requires proportional attention, resources and opportunity for all persons. The practical task is to identify needs and make a defensible decision using the resources available.
Equitability · Judgement · Culturally Aware · Humanity
The same workplace can bring together different languages, experiences and positions of authority. The existing PVL definition already requires culturally and contextually appropriate humour. The person must meet that requirement as the people and circumstances around them change.
Humour · Observant · Empathy · Humanity
Understanding the 24 Positive Leadership Values across different cultures can develop progressively. IOWL envisages a short optional companion to Module 4: The Positive Value Leadership Framework in Foundation, Keystone and Capstone, with a more demanding programme as a potential future route towards Senior Fellowship.
Can the same Value be demonstrated in different ways? Distinguish a positive commitment from a familiar personal or cultural style.
Why can language, relationships and expectations change the apparent meaning of behaviour? Learn to question assumptions before judging.
How should a leader respond when Values, obligations or expected outcomes appear to conflict? Examine evidence and justify an action.
How can PVL's global applicability be researched, challenged, defended and responsibly advanced through philosophical and empirical enquiry?
These additional learning elements and Senior Fellowship are proposals, not currently offered courses or conferred designations. The established Foundation, Keystone and Capstone course structures are unchanged by this page.
The 24 Positive Values and six Exemplars provide the normative foundation. The comparison on this page places that defined framework alongside selected primary texts, community accounts and educational frameworks. It shows recognisable points of contact while preserving the precise meaning of each PVL Value.
Some connections use an explicit shared term, such as Honesty or Humility. Others concern a related function, such as the connection between critical understanding and Information Aware. These comparisons are IOWL's analysis; the cited traditions retain their own identities and meanings.
No. Ethical relativism is a contested philosophical position. PVL articulates a defined, non-relativist normative basis for developing and evaluating conduct: customs, preferences and local approval do not in themselves settle what counts as positive. The matrix and the examples are comparative evidence and illustrations, not a philosophical proof of objective moral truth. [56]
Start with the official Value definition; establish the person's intended meaning and relevant language or cultural context; examine the actual behaviour and the experience of those affected; then evaluate reasons and consequences against the six Principles and all relevant Values. If new evidence changes the picture, revisit the initial judgement. Do not assume that a nationality or belief uniquely determines how an individual behaves.
Potentially. For example, both direct and private truthful correction may satisfy Honesty; a public or private challenge may support Questioning. Neither route receives automatic approval: the reasons, accuracy, access, consequences and interaction with other Values must be examined.
Because an authoritative operational definition does not remove every ambiguity of language, translation or application. Deconstruction can help reveal assumptions and exclusions in an interpretation. IOWL retains its definitions as a common reference while taking those interpretive risks seriously; it does not claim that Derrida endorsed or validated PVL. [57]
PVL and Perpetual Calibre Development (PCD) are politically agnostic. They provide a common foundation for developing and examining leadership across political and institutional contexts. The reference points are the defined Positive Values and Principles, a person’s conduct and the consequences of their actions.
Political agnosticism preserves the full Values baseline. The same commitments guide reflection and development in every setting, including how power is exercised, how people are treated and how resources are used.
PVL provides IOWL’s own defined leadership framework. Its use does not require adherence to any faith or worldview represented in the matrix. The comparisons help people recognise points of contact from different starting positions. They are not statements that PVL is derived from, belongs to, or is endorsed by any one of those traditions.
PVL is designed as a globally applicable Positive Values framework. Its underlying concerns have recognisable connections across African, Asian, Indigenous, religious, secular and international approaches, as the references show. IOWL's Belfast origins are part of its history; the model is not restricted to the cultural context of its origin. Its own Values include Open Minded, Culturally Aware and Internationally Minded.
No. The 24 definitions and six Principles remain the common baseline. Local deployment concerns faithful language, accessible learning, relevant examples and actions that meet the same commitments in real circumstances. A person or institution cannot redefine a Value to remove the difficulty of exercising it.
Yes. The framework establishes a common foundation that can be enriched by further positive personal, organisational or cultural commitments. Those additions preserve the full baseline and its definitions.
No. Different responsibilities, pressures and experiences make some Values more challenging at particular times. The learner examines those challenges against the same definitions. Positive Values remain relevant as the person's life, work and context change.
That tension becomes a subject for reflection and responsible action. Cultural understanding helps the learner understand the circumstances and choose a credible response. The same PVL definitions remain the basis for examining the action and its consequences. UNESCO also connects respect for cultural diversity with human dignity and rights. [1]
The references substantiate what the selected sources say; the PVL connections are comparative interpretations. They support the argument for global relevance without claiming that every person already agrees with the model, that the cited institutions endorse it, or that each country has empirically validated the complete PVL architecture.
Schwartz's 2012 overview reports evidence from 82 countries for his own theory of basic values, alongside differences in value priorities. It provides relevant research context; it is not a test of PVL's 24-Value architecture. [17]
PVL's ambition to offer an efficacious common baseline is a design purpose. Claims about relative effectiveness, learning outcomes or cross-context assessment require their own evidence. The comparisons here are illustrative rather than a systematic review or an account of the historical selection process.
Source links support the comparisons above. IOWL’s official framework wording is also presented on the Leadership Exemplars page; the rationale for the defined baseline is explained in Why 24 Positive Values?
Follow the common Positive Values foundation into reflection, development, Calibre and responsible action in the circumstances of real life.
Ask Athena